Cross-efficiency aggregation based on interval conditional entropy: An application to forest carbon sink efficiency

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Siting [1 ]
You, Cuiling [1 ]
Wu, Nan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fujian, Fuzhou, China
[2] College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fujian, Fuzhou, China
[3] TheCollectiveForestryReformandDevelopmentResearchCenterofNewTypesofThinkTankswithUniversities in Fujian, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fujian, Fuzhou, China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon - Data envelopment analysis - Decision making - Efficiency - Forestry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cross-efficiency evaluation is an extension of data envelopment analysis (DEA), which can effectively distinguish between decision-making units (DMUs) through self- and peer-evaluation. The cross-efficiency of each DMU in a set of DMUs is measured in terms of intervals when the input–output data are represented by the number of intervals. Based on the interval cross-efficiency matrix, the interval entropy is defined in terms of the likelihood. Then, considering the influence of peer evaluation, the interval conditional cross-efficiency entropy is proposed and an aggregation model of the interval conditional cross-efficiency entropy is presented to create a ranking index for DMUs. Finally, a simple example is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, which is applied to the evaluation of forest carbon sink efficiency in China. The results indicate that the final cross-efficiencies of all 30 provinces range from 0 to 0.6. Among these provinces, those with a relatively high efficiency include Guangdong, Guizhou, Hainan, Shandong, and Qinghai. © 2024 – IOS Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4397 / 4415
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A DEA cross-efficiency approach based on bargaining theory
    Contreras, I.
    Lozano, S.
    Hinojosa, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2021, 72 (05) : 1156 - 1167
  • [42] The research on the application of cross-efficiency to multiple attributes decision making
    Jing, Hao
    Zhao, Xinan
    Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-4: MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A GLOBAL WORLD, 2007, : 2492 - 2497
  • [43] A resource allocation mechanism based on novel cross-efficiency
    Zhang Q.
    Liu Y.
    Wang X.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2024, 44 (05): : 1522 - 1533
  • [44] Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach
    Yang, Guo-liang
    Yang, Jian-bo
    Liu, Wen-bin
    Li, Xiao-xuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 231 (02) : 393 - 404
  • [45] Ranking DMUs by Comparing DEA Cross-Efficiency Intervals Using Entropy Measures
    Lu, Tim
    Liu, Shiang-Tai
    ENTROPY, 2016, 18 (12)
  • [46] Hybrid game cross efficiency evaluation models based on interval data: A case of forest carbon sequestration
    Huang, Yan
    He, Xiao
    Dai, Yongwu
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 204
  • [47] Efficiency evaluation research of a regional water system based on a game cross-efficiency model
    Zhang, Wenyu
    Yu, Hongze
    Ren, Lu
    Dong, Qing
    Zhao, Chenxiao
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34 (12) : 9441 - 9454
  • [48] Efficiency evaluation research of a regional water system based on a game cross-efficiency model
    Wenyu Zhang
    Hongze Yu
    Lu Ren
    Qing Dong
    Chenxiao Zhao
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34 : 9441 - 9454
  • [49] Efficiency evaluation research of a regional water system based on a game cross-efficiency model
    Zhang, Wenyu
    Yu, Hongze
    Ren, Lu
    Dong, Qing
    Zhao, Chenxiao
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2022, 34 (12): : 9441 - 9454
  • [50] A neutral cross-efficiency evaluation method based on interval reference points in consideration of bounded rational behavior
    Shi, Hai-Liu
    Chen, Sheng-Qun
    Chen, Lei
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 290 (03) : 1098 - 1110