An investigation of the shear bond strength of compomer restorative material to enamel and dentine

被引:0
|
作者
Division of Restorative Dentistry, Bristol Dental School, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS1 2LY, United Kingdom [1 ]
机构
来源
Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. | 2006年 / 4卷 / 237-241期
关键词
Adhesives - Bonding - Enamels - Etching - Shear strength;
D O I
10.1525/fsr.2006.18.4.237
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of one step adhesives on the shear bond strength of a compomer restorative material to both enamel and dentine. Human extracted teeth were used for the study. Ten samples were prepared for both enamel and dentine specimens for each of the five groups: Tooth, no etch, Prime and Bond NT (P+B NT); tooth, Non-Rinse Conditioner (NRC), P+B NT; tooth, NRC, Prime and Bond 2.1 (P+B 2.1); tooth, etch, P+B NT; tooth, etch, P+B 2.1. The specimens were subjected to bond testing. The shear bond strength was measured using an Inston 1193 testing machine using a cross head speed of 1 mm/minute. The specimens were tested to destraction. The results show that for the enamel specimens the highest bond strength was recorded for those specimens subjected to Etch, P+B 2.1 (22.1 MPa) and Etch P+B NT (20.0 MPa). The groups of specimens which did not undergo etching had very low bond strengths ranging from 11.4 MPa for NRC, P+B 2.1, 8.5 MPa for NRC P+B NT to 6.9 MPa for P+B NT. For the dentine specimens, for all of the groups, the shear bond strengths were low. Those groups subjected to etching produced the highest values of 7.9 MPa for NRC P+B 2.1 with the lowest value of 6.1 MPa for NRC P+B NT. These bond strengths were significantly lower than those achieved for bonding to enamel. Prime and Bond NT and Prime and Bond 2.1, used in conjunction with acid etching, produce satisfactory bond strengths of compomer restorative material to enamel. Bond strengths to dentine were low. © 2006 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives
    Gordan, VV
    Boyer, D
    Soderholm, KJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1998, 26 (5-6) : 497 - 503
  • [32] In vitro dentin bond strength and microleakage of nano-ionomer restorative in comparison with compomer
    Yilmaz, Z. B.
    Okte, Z.
    MATERIALS RESEARCH INNOVATIONS, 2011, 15 (05) : 314 - 318
  • [33] BOND STRENGTH OF THREE ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE MATERIALS TO ENAMEL AND DENTIN
    YEDID, SE
    CHAN, KC
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1980, 44 (05): : 573 - 576
  • [34] Enamel and dentin bond strength of a glass ionomer restorative cement
    GarciaGodoy, F
    Werner, C
    Avila, I
    Ceron, AM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 1224 - 1224
  • [35] Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials
    Nujella, Suryakumari B. P.
    Choudary, Manisha T.
    Reddy, Satyanarayana P.
    Kumar, Kiran M.
    Gopal, T.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2012, 3 (01) : 22 - 26
  • [36] Shear bond strength of dentine bonding systems to dentine surfaces contaminated with blood and saliva
    Van Schalkwyk, J
    Botha, FS
    De Wit, FA
    Van der Vyver, PJ
    Botha, SJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B369 - B369
  • [37] Shear bond strength at varying dentine depth of three dentine bonding agent.
    Thalerngsak, S
    Khate, SS
    Jutiporn, P
    Nawat, K
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 669 - 669
  • [38] Effects on shear bond strength and the enamel surface with an enamel bonding agent
    Shahabi, Mostafa
    Heravi, Farzin
    Mokhber, Nima
    Karamad, Reza
    Bishara, Samir E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 137 (03) : 375 - 378
  • [39] Clinical evaluation of a compomer restorative material.
    Latta, MA
    Barkmeier, WW
    Cavel, WT
    Dilorenzio, SC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A52 - A52
  • [40] Effects of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of compomer to dentin in primary teeth
    Özer, L
    Özalp, N
    Ökte, Z
    Öztas, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2006, 19 (01): : 28 - 30