A study on the electrical fire risk assessment methods of LED lightings for outdoor

被引:0
|
作者
Kim H.-K.
Kim D.-O.
Choi H.-S.
机构
关键词
Abnormal voltage; Dielectric breakdown; Electric fire; Led lighting; Poor contact; Short circuit;
D O I
10.5370/kiee.2011.60.3.674
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we experimented and analyzed about electric fire risk assessment methods of LED lightings for outdoor. LED lighting is composed of AC power lines, AC/DC converter, DC power lines and LED lamps. There are some risk factors of electric fire in LED lighting such as short circuit between power lines or power line and ground, dielectric breakdown, leakage current, abnormal voltage inflow, poor contacts (connections), etc. As a result of this study, insulation coverings of wire was ignited due to dielectric breakdown between power lines and molten marks were formed in copper conductor. LED lighting was blown out while short circuit, beside that, electrical disorder did not occur. When abnormal voltage was inflowed, electronic components such as varistor, condenser were damaged. Partial heating was produced and insulation was melted and carbonized by arc and heating while poor contacts were happened. We expect that the results of this study would be helpful for electrical safety of LED lightings for outdoor.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 624
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPROVING FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT METHODS.
    Ramachandran, G.
    Fire Engineers Journal, 1982, 42 (124): : 17 - 20
  • [2] Study on risk assessment for mine fire
    Zhizhou, Yang
    Wenhua, Song
    Bin, Yuan
    Zhongli, Li
    Progress in Mining Science and Safety Technology, Pts A and B, 2007, : 1735 - 1740
  • [3] Fire risk assessment and efficiency study of active and passive protection methods in reducing the risk of fire in a control room of at an industrial building
    Askaripoor, Taleb
    Shirali, Gholam Abbas
    Yarahmadi, Rasool
    Kazemi, Elahe
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK, 2018, 8 (01) : 93 - +
  • [4] Comparison and Analysis of Building Fire Risk Assessment Methods
    Wu, Lizhi
    Guo, Shigang
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND SAFETY (ICSRS), 2018, : 381 - 385
  • [5] Study on Fire Safety Assessment of High Fire Risk Unit
    Ren, Changxing
    Li, Jin
    Sun, Xiaotao
    Wang, Jie
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2014, 102 : 725 - 729
  • [6] Study on quantification scheme of weight coefficient for electrical fire risk assessment of high-rise building
    Su, Lei
    Zhang, Fan
    Yang, Fan
    Zhang, Lei
    Shen, Yu
    Wei, Chongwen
    Yang, Zhichun
    International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 2022, 13
  • [7] 'She'll be right'. Or will she? Practitioner perspectives on risk assessment for led outdoor activities in Australia
    Dallat, Clare
    Goode, Natassia
    Salmon, Paul M.
    JOURNAL OF ADVENTURE EDUCATION AND OUTDOOR LEARNING, 2018, 18 (02): : 115 - 131
  • [8] Methods advances in the EPRI/USNRC fire risk requantification study - Fire modeling
    Nowlen, SP
    Najafi, B
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 2732 - 2737
  • [9] PV electrical plants fire risk assessment and mitigation according to the Italian national fire services guidelines
    Cancelliere, Piergiacomo
    FIRE AND MATERIALS, 2016, 40 (03) : 355 - 367
  • [10] Hazard assessment of fire in electrical cabinets
    Avidor, E
    Joglar-Billoch, FJ
    Mowrer, FW
    Modarres, M
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 144 (03) : 337 - 357