Assessment of groundwater contamination by using numerical methods

被引:1
|
作者
Al-Aboodi A.H. [1 ]
Hameed Khlif T. [1 ]
Ibrahim H.T. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Basrah, Faculty of Engineering
关键词
Assessment; GIS; Groundwater; MD-DRASTIC; SINTACS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.377
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Groundwater vulnerability maps by numerical methods help to set priorities for identifying areas that are most affected by pollutants, enabling decision makers, departments and government agencies to save additional funds in the event of a groundwater monitoring and protection system for the entire study area.Numerical methods as SINTACS and Modified DRASTIC with GIS technologies are depended in this study. SINTACS Vulnerability Index (SVI) is based on seven parameters while Modified DRASTIC Index (MDI) is based on eight parameters but both methods are adopted weighted sum overlay of the parameters. Final results of SINTACS Vulnerability map depicts four classes from very low to high which varies from (77 to 144). About 82.81% of study area is classified under moderate vulnerability; the remaining 15.08% and 1.75% are under high and low vulnerability respectively. MD- DRASTIC vulnerability map ranges (85–179). This range of index values is divided into four classes including very low to high vulnerability classes. About (72.35%) of the study basin has moderate vulnerability. High vulnerability measured as a second effective class of the studied area with (20.5%). While low and very low areas comprise (6.45% and 0.6%) respectively. Comparative study of two vulnerability maps with water quality data represented by nitrate concentration showed that MD- DRASTIC method is more suitable to represent the real reality of pollution of the area. © 2021
引用
收藏
页码:2419 / 2431
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Groundwater contamination vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC method, GSA, and uncertainty analysis
    Alireza Razavi Dizaji
    Seyed Abbas Hosseini
    Vahid Rezaverdinejad
    Ahmad Sharafati
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13
  • [32] Assessment of groundwater arsenic contamination level in Jharkhand, India using machine learning
    Kumar, Siddharth
    Pati, Jayadeep
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63
  • [33] Groundwater contamination vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC method, GSA, and uncertainty analysis
    Dizaji, Alireza Razavi
    Hosseini, Seyed Abbas
    Rezaverdinejad, Vahid
    Sharafati, Ahmad
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 13 (14)
  • [34] Assessment of Fluoride Contamination in Groundwater as Precursor for Electrocoagulation
    P. J. Sajil Kumar
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2012, 89 : 172 - 175
  • [35] Risk Assessment for Petroleum Contamination Exposure in Groundwater
    Shen, Jing
    Huang, Guohe
    Yang, Qi
    Li, Chao
    Shi, Bin
    Shen, Yangshuo
    He, Li
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PTS 1-6, 2012, 518-523 : 987 - +
  • [36] Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to contamination: a case study
    Reshma, R.
    Sindhu, G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (06)
  • [37] Assessment of fluoride contamination in groundwater as precursor for electrocoagulation
    BTU, 03046 Cottbus, Germany
    Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 1 (172-175):
  • [38] A methodology for the assessment of risk of Cryptosporidium contamination of groundwater
    Boak, RA
    Packman, MJ
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY, 2001, 34 (02): : 187 - 194
  • [39] Groundwater Vulnerability and Nitrate Contamination Assessment and Mapping Using DRASTIC and Geostatistical Analysis
    El Baba, Moustafa
    Kayastha, Prabin
    Huysmans, Marijke
    De Smedt, Florimond
    WATER, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [40] PROBABILISTIC SCREENING TOOL FOR GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT
    HAMED, MM
    CONTE, JP
    BEDIENT, PB
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (11): : 767 - 775