The role of hydrothermal alteration in uranium mineralization at the Xiaoshan uranium deposit, South China

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Fu-Rong [1 ]
Zhang, Yong [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Dang, Fei-Peng [3 ]
Huang, Di [3 ]
Zhong, Fu-Jun [1 ]
Yan, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Fei [1 ]
Pan, Chun-Rong [1 ]
Pan, Jia-Yong [1 ]
Han, Shan-Chu [1 ]
Liu, Guo-Qi [1 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Tian [1 ]
Liu, Ying [1 ]
Wang, Kai-Xing [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Technol, State Key Lab Nucl Resources & Environm, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Technol, Jiangxi Prov Key Lab Genesis & Prospect Strateg Mi, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
[3] China Natl Nucl Corp, Res Inst 270, Nanchang 330200, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[4] Inst Geol Survey East China Univ Technol, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hydrothermal alteration; Element migration; Xiaoshan deposit; Granite-type uranium deposit; MASSIVE SULFIDE DEPOSIT; AU-AG DEPOSIT; LA-ICP-MS; STABLE-ISOTOPE; TRACE-ELEMENTS; REPLACEMENT REACTIONS; GEOTHERMAL-FIELD; APATITE; GRANITE; GEOCHEMISTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106324
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Hydrothermal alteration can be utilized to constrain element migrations during mineralization, as it records the effects of fluid-rock interactions. Previous studies have suggested that uranium in deposits primarily originates from uranium-bearing granites; however, limited knowledge exists regarding the leaching mechamisms of this element and rare earth elements (REEs) from these rocks. In recent years, the Xiaoshan Deposit, a newly discovered medium-sized uranium deposit, has been discovered in the central part of the Lujing uranium ore field, South China. In this study, we examine this deposit to investigate hydrothermal alterations and their impact on elemental mass change. The deposit exhibits seven types of alteration including K-feldspar, albite, illite, sericite, muscovite, quartz and chlorite alteration. These alterations follow a certain sequence, starting from chlorite alteration, followed by widespread K-feldspar alteration, then to albite alteration, accompanied by muscovite alteration, and finally illite, sericite and quartz alteration. The main uranium mineralization stage was coeval with the late acid siliceous hydrothermal fluid, illite and sericite alteration. The pre-ore alkaline alteration (K-feldspar alteration) resulted in the leaching and extraction of uranium, leading to the precipitation of a significant amount of apatite in mineral interstices and initial uranium enrichment (Delta Ci (U) = 16.52 ppm). This process facilitated material preparation for subsequent acidic alterations and localized ore enrichment. The original dense rock structure was disrupted, creating fractures/cavities that served as conduits for uranium mineralization. Moreover, under alkaline metasomatism, uranium and REEs was extensively leached out of uranium-bearing accessory minerals such as the apatite. According to apatite compositional variations and alteration geochemistry, these variations reveal the process of uranium dissolution, migration, and precipitation enrichment into ore bodies. Uranium was completely released during alkaline metasomatism, causing a sharp decline in U content from 53.1 ppm to 0.96 ppm. The formation of alkaline alteration fluids facilitates the extraction of uranium from the surrounding rocks (the Indosinian granite).
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mineralogy and geochemistry of hydrothermal alteration of the Mianhuakeng uranium deposit in South China: Implications for mineralization and exploration
    Zhong, Fu-Jun
    Wang, Ling
    Wang, Kai-Xing
    Liu, Jun-Gang
    Zhang, Yong
    Li, Haidong
    Yang, Shuang
    Chen, Yi-Ping
    Xia, Fei
    Pan, Jia-Yong
    ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS, 2023, 160
  • [2] Geology, alteration system and uranium mineralization of Tamusu large uranium deposit, China
    Liu, Bo
    Hao, Peng
    Zhang, Zilong
    Guo, Xujie
    Zhang, Pengfei
    Shi, Zhiqiang
    ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS, 2023, 158
  • [3] The role of hydrothermal alteration in tungsten mineralization at the Dahutang tungsten deposit, South China
    Zhang, Yong
    Gao, Jian-Feng
    Ma, Dongsheng
    Pan, Jiayong
    ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS, 2018, 95 : 1008 - 1027
  • [4] Hydrothermal alteration and element migration in the Egongtang uranium deposit, central Nanling Range, South China
    Yan, Jie
    Zhong, Fujun
    Pan, Jiayong
    Xia, Fei
    Zeng, Renyu
    Wu, Dehai
    GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE, 2023, 160 (04) : 755 - 775
  • [5] New Identification of Quaternary Uranium Mineralization at the Mianhuakeng Granite-Related Uranium Deposit, South China
    Long Zhang
    Fangyue Wang
    Journal of Earth Science, 2023, 34 : 1635 - 1640
  • [6] New Identification of Quaternary Uranium Mineralization at the Mianhuakeng Granite-Related Uranium Deposit, South China
    Zhang, Long
    Wang, Fangyue
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 34 (05) : 1635 - 1640
  • [7] New Identification of Quaternary Uranium Mineralization at the Mianhuakeng Granite-Related Uranium Deposit, South China
    Long Zhang
    Fangyue Wang
    Journal of Earth Science, 2023, 34 (05) : 1635 - 1640
  • [8] New Identification of Quaternary Uranium Mineralization at the Mianhuakeng Granite-Related Uranium Deposit, South China
    Long Zhang
    Fangyue Wang
    Journal of Earth Science, 2023, (05) : 1635 - 1640
  • [9] Hydrothermal alteration and elemental mass changes of the Xiangyangping uranium deposit in the Miao'ershan ore field, South China
    Yu, Chi-Da
    Wang, Kai-Xing
    Liu, Xiao-Dong
    Pan, Jia-Yong
    Chen, Qi
    Zhang, Jian
    ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS, 2020, 125
  • [10] Mineralization mechanism and geodynamic setting of No.337 uranium deposit, South China
    Zhang, Zhanshi
    Liu, S.
    Wu, J. H.
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 73 (13) : A1515 - A1515