Effects of various operational parameters on biomass gasification process; A modified equilibrium model

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Ghassemi, Hojat
[2] Shahsavan-Markadeh, Rasoul
来源
关键词
Biomass Gasification - Cold gas efficiency - Equilibrium modeling - Fuel types - Gasification temperatures - Gibbs free energy minimization - Higher heating value - Operational parameters;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper by means of a modified equilibrium model based on Gibbs free energy minimization, performance of biomass gasification process is studied. Effects of parameters such as equivalence ratio, gasification temperature, fuel type and its moisture content, and gasifying agent, are investigated. Model results show that temperature has significant influence on cold gas efficiency more remarkably at lower temperature and has negligible effect on syngas heating value. Enriching the air with O2 increases gas higher heating value (HHV) and for larger amount of oxygen it shows a maximum as equivalence ratio increases. Cold gas efficiency for higher oxygen amount is larger and its maximum obtained at lower equivalence ratio. By increasing the H/C molar ratio of biomass, cold gas efficiency increases but biomass O/C ratio shows adverse effect. Moisture content of biomass has negative effects on cold gas efficiency and HHV. For higher equivalence ratio this negative effect decreases. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomass gasification using oxygen-enriched air: Process simulation based on equilibrium calculations
    Cao, Yan
    Bai, Yu
    Du, Jiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2025, 100 : 1353 - 1360
  • [42] Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass: A Thermodynamic Model for the Prediction of Product Compounds at Equilibrium State
    Yakaboylu, Onursal
    Harinck, John
    Smit, K. G.
    de Jong, Wiebren
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2014, 28 (04) : 2506 - 2522
  • [43] Effects of Biomass Properties on Hematite Flash Reduction-Biomass Steam Gasification Coupling Process
    Wang, Xingnan
    Fu, Guiqin
    Li, Wei
    Zhu, Miaoyong
    Gao, Yongliang
    Chen, Xuegang
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE METALLURGY, 2021, 7 (04) : 1717 - 1726
  • [44] CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL FOR FIXED-BED GASIFICATION TO ASSESS BIOMASS ENERGY CONTENT
    Verdeza, Arnaldo
    Ahumada, Luz
    Bula, Antonio
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2015, VOL 6A, 2016,
  • [45] Effects of Biomass Properties on Hematite Flash Reduction-Biomass Steam Gasification Coupling Process
    Xingnan Wang
    Guiqin Fu
    Wei Li
    Miaoyong Zhu
    Yongliang Gao
    Xuegang Chen
    Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 2021, 7 : 1717 - 1726
  • [46] Waste to energy by industrially integrated SCWG - Effect of process parameters on gasification of industrial biomass
    Myreen, Lillemor
    Ronnlund, Ida
    Lundqvist, Kurt
    Ahlbeck, Jarl
    Westerlund, Tapio
    CISAP4: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRY, 2010, 19 : 7 - 12
  • [47] Effects of operational parameters on bio-oil production from biomass
    Uresin, Ersin
    Gulsac, Isil Isik
    Budak, Mustafa Salih
    Unsal, Mehmet
    Buyuksakalli, Kader Ozgur
    Aksoy, Parvana
    Sayar, Asli
    Unlu, Namik
    Okur, Osman
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2019, 37 (05) : 516 - 529
  • [48] Development of a semi-empirical model for woody biomass gasification based on stoichiometric thermodynamic equilibrium model
    Silva, Isabelly P.
    Lima, Rafael M. A.
    Santana, Hortencia E. P.
    Silva, Gabriel F.
    Ruzene, Denise S.
    Silva, Daniel P.
    ENERGY, 2022, 241
  • [49] Biomass gasification in a fixed bed downdraft reactor with oxygen enriched air: a modified equilibrium modeling study
    Sittisun, Poramate
    Tippayawong, Nakorn
    Pang, Shusheng
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND POWER (ICEP2018), 2019, 160 : 317 - 323
  • [50] Exergy analysis of biomass-to-synthetic natural gas (SNG) process via indirect gasification of various biomass feedstock
    Vitasari, Caecilia R.
    Jurascik, Martin
    Ptasinski, Krzysztof J.
    ENERGY, 2011, 36 (06) : 3825 - 3837