THE SOCIAL COST OF CARBON EVALUATION BASED ON CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES FOR POWER GENERATION PLANTS

被引:0
|
作者
Kon O. [1 ]
Caner İ. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Balikesir University, Balikesir
[2] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep
关键词
carbon capture and storage; coals; power plants; ReCiPe; the social cost of carbon;
D O I
10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.2023047201
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Power plants produce electricity using high amounts of fossil fuels such as coal. Using these fossil fuels releases very high emissions into the atmosphere. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) applications have been developed to reduce these emissions. Thus, by capturing 96% of the CO2 formed from the burning of fuels in power plants, the global warming potentials emitted by conventional electricity generation can be reduced by up to 80%. The study investigated applications of CCS options to reduce emissions during electricity generation, CO2 emissions, pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxyfuel coupled global warming potentials. The reCiPe midpoint method has been taken into account for CO2 emission. CCS options calculate the reduction in global warming potential. The study accepts that hard and brown coal is used as fuel in power plants that produce electricity. Finally, for the three cities with the highest electricity consumption in Turkey, the global warming potential emission in conventional electricity generation power plants burning brown coal is calculated as 43.4 kilotons for plants burning brown coal. It has been calculated as 6.2 kilotons in power plants using oxyfuel CCS and burning hard coal. Ten-year life for Istanbul, for hard coal burning and pre-combustion related discount rate of 1% and 3 $/ton social cost of carbon; The social cost of carbon is calculated as $102.8 million. © 2024 by Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 76
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Case for Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies
    Hochman, Gal
    Appasamy, Vijay
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 11 (03)
  • [22] Prospects for carbon capture and storage technologies
    Anderson, S
    Newell, R
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2004, 29 : 109 - 142
  • [23] Life cycle and cost assessment of mineral carbonation for carbon capture and storage in European power generation
    Giannoulakis, Stylianos
    Volkart, Kathrin
    Bauer, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 21 : 140 - 157
  • [24] Cost of carbon capture and storage and renewable energy generation based on the learning curve method
    Chen, W. (chenwy@tsinghua.edu.cn), 2012, Press of Tsinghua University (52):
  • [25] Water and climate risks to power generation with carbon capture and storage
    Byers, E. A.
    Hall, J. W.
    Amezaga, J. M.
    O'Donnell, G. M.
    Leathard, A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [26] Evaluation of power generation schemes based on hydrogen-fuelled combined cycle with carbon capture and storage (CCS)
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (05) : 3726 - 3738
  • [27] CARBON FOOTPRINT OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN A CONCEPTUAL BIOENERGY POWER PLANT WITH CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE
    Nemer, Martha
    Duque, Jorge
    Aviles, Daniel
    Salas, Daniel
    Ramirez, Angel D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 7, 2023,
  • [28] Evaluation of two alternative carbon capture and storage technologies: A stochastic model
    Abadie, Luis M.
    Galarraga, Ibon
    Ruebbelke, Dirk
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 54 : 182 - 195
  • [29] Can Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage from Power Plants Reduce the Environmental Impact of Electricity Generation?
    Petrakopoulou, Fontina
    Tsatsaronis, George
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2014, 28 (08) : 5327 - 5338