What Do Users Think of Promotional Gamification Schemes A Qualitative Case Study in a Question Answering Website

被引:3
|
作者
Hadi Mogavi R. [1 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ]
Haq E.-U. [1 ]
Wu Y. [1 ]
Hui P. [2 ]
Ma X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
[2] Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and University of Helsinki, Hong Kong
关键词
affective response; community question answering website (CQA); demotivators; engagement; gamification; gamification design; motivators; promotional gamification; qualitative research;
D O I
10.1145/3555124
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, studies on the user experience have emerged as an indispensable part of any gamification research. The study of user experience enables gamification designers and practitioners to design or adapt their gamification schemes in a more knowledgeable and efficacious manner. However, one popular gamification scheme that has largely remained under-researched in terms of user experience is promotional gamification, which refers to an optional and time-limited gamification program that usually mounts an already gamified platform to increase user incentive and engagement for a short span of time (e.g., during the holiday season). The current study undertakes the first steps necessary to explore users' experiences of working with a promotional gamification scheme in a large-scale online community. To this end, we conduct an extensive qualitative case study of users' experiences with a promotional gamification scheme on the Community Question Answering Website (CQA) of Stack Exchange, called Winter Bash (WB). Notably, the purpose of WB is to operate as a makeshift solution that prevents the decline in user contributions during the holiday season. However, like many other gamification schemes, WB is not devoid of issues, and our research helps identify those issues without overlooking the WB's strengths. Our study denotes not only the first (empirical) typology of users' affective responses to promotional gamification schemes but also the first classification of (de)motivational factors involved in user engagement. At its core, this study comprises two salient parts: (1) a content analysis of user-generated data regarding WB (from the past eight years), and (2) a series of semi-structured interviews with 17 international users who are familiar with WB. We triangulate our findings from (1) and (2) by performing a similar content analysis for two other promotional gamification schemes, namely "Answerathon"(from Travel Meta) and "Discussion Tournament"(from Reddit). Based on the findings of this study, we present certain guidelines for gamification designers and practitioners, enabling them to deploy or adapt their promotional gamification schemes in a more knowledgeable and effective manner. Finally, our work is concluded by highlighting a few novel research opportunities for researchers invested in the fields of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). © 2022 ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What do hotel employees think about service robots? A qualitative study in Turkey
    Vatan, Ahmet
    Dogan, Seden
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 37
  • [22] What do patients think about HIV mass screening in France? A qualitative study
    Fernandez-Gerlinger, Marie Paule
    Bernard, Erik
    Saint-Lary, Olivier
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [23] What do medical students think are characteristics of a good ultrasound tutor? A qualitative study
    Walter, Robin
    Alt, Leander
    Hari, Roman
    Harris, Michael
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] What do patients think about HIV mass screening in France? A qualitative study
    Marie Paule Fernandez-Gerlinger
    Erik Bernard
    Olivier Saint-Lary
    BMC Public Health, 13
  • [25] How do students process complex formative feedback in question-answering tasks? A think-aloud study
    Ignacio Máñez
    Eduardo Vidal-Abarca
    Panayiota Kendeou
    Tomás Martínez
    Metacognition and Learning, 2019, 14 : 65 - 87
  • [26] How do students process complex formative feedback in question-answering tasks? A think-aloud study
    Manez, Ignacio
    Vidal-Abarca, Eduardo
    Kendeou, Panayiota
    Martinez, Tomas
    METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2019, 14 (01) : 65 - 87
  • [27] What Do Children with Chronic Diseases and Their Parents Think About Pediatricians? A Qualitative Interview Study
    Konstantynowicz, Jerzy
    Marcinowicz, Ludmila
    Abramowicz, Pawel
    Abramowicz, Magdalena
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2016, 20 (08) : 1745 - 1752
  • [28] WHAT DO PEOPLE THINK AND FEEL ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION FOR HIP PAIN?: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Haber, Travis S.
    Hall, Michelle
    Hinman, Rana S.
    Lawford, Belinda
    Zhu, Shiyi
    Bunzli, Samantha
    Jinks, Clare
    O'Keeffe, Mary
    Dobson, Fiona
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 : S196 - S196
  • [29] What do specialists and GPs think about the introduction of colorectal cancer screening? A qualitative study
    Abel, Gillian M.
    Thompson, Lee
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (1338) : 89 - 95
  • [30] What do women think about abnormal smear test results? A qualitative interview study
    Lagro-Janssen, T
    Schijf, C
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 26 (02): : 141 - 145