What Do Users Think of Promotional Gamification Schemes A Qualitative Case Study in a Question Answering Website

被引:3
|
作者
Hadi Mogavi R. [1 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ]
Haq E.-U. [1 ]
Wu Y. [1 ]
Hui P. [2 ]
Ma X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
[2] Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and University of Helsinki, Hong Kong
关键词
affective response; community question answering website (CQA); demotivators; engagement; gamification; gamification design; motivators; promotional gamification; qualitative research;
D O I
10.1145/3555124
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, studies on the user experience have emerged as an indispensable part of any gamification research. The study of user experience enables gamification designers and practitioners to design or adapt their gamification schemes in a more knowledgeable and efficacious manner. However, one popular gamification scheme that has largely remained under-researched in terms of user experience is promotional gamification, which refers to an optional and time-limited gamification program that usually mounts an already gamified platform to increase user incentive and engagement for a short span of time (e.g., during the holiday season). The current study undertakes the first steps necessary to explore users' experiences of working with a promotional gamification scheme in a large-scale online community. To this end, we conduct an extensive qualitative case study of users' experiences with a promotional gamification scheme on the Community Question Answering Website (CQA) of Stack Exchange, called Winter Bash (WB). Notably, the purpose of WB is to operate as a makeshift solution that prevents the decline in user contributions during the holiday season. However, like many other gamification schemes, WB is not devoid of issues, and our research helps identify those issues without overlooking the WB's strengths. Our study denotes not only the first (empirical) typology of users' affective responses to promotional gamification schemes but also the first classification of (de)motivational factors involved in user engagement. At its core, this study comprises two salient parts: (1) a content analysis of user-generated data regarding WB (from the past eight years), and (2) a series of semi-structured interviews with 17 international users who are familiar with WB. We triangulate our findings from (1) and (2) by performing a similar content analysis for two other promotional gamification schemes, namely "Answerathon"(from Travel Meta) and "Discussion Tournament"(from Reddit). Based on the findings of this study, we present certain guidelines for gamification designers and practitioners, enabling them to deploy or adapt their promotional gamification schemes in a more knowledgeable and effective manner. Finally, our work is concluded by highlighting a few novel research opportunities for researchers invested in the fields of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). © 2022 ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] More Gamification Is Not Always Better: A Case Study of Promotional Gamification in a Question Answering Website
    Hadi Mogavi R.
    Haq E.-U.
    Gujar S.
    Hui P.
    Ma X.
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2022, 6 (CSCW2):
  • [2] WHAT DO USERS REALLY THINK ABOUT CASE
    YELLEN, RE
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1992, 43 (02): : 16 - &
  • [3] Answering the question "How do I know what to study?"
    Cole, RS
    Moore, JW
    O'Grady, BV
    Ottosen, RM
    Miller, ML
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 218 : U328 - U328
  • [4] What do people think employee share ownership schemes do for them? A qualitative study of participants' experiences in three UK share schemes
    McConville, David
    Arnold, John
    Smith, Alison
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 31 (18): : 2340 - 2371
  • [5] What Web Users Copy to the Clipboard on a Website: A Case Study
    Kirsh, Ilan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (WEBIST), 2020, : 303 - 312
  • [6] What do parents think about vaccination? A qualitative study
    Amouyal, Michel
    Vallart, Marion
    Bourrel, Gerard
    Oude-Engberink, Agnes
    EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE, 2013, 24 (105): : 12 - 19
  • [7] What do patients think about during their consultations? A qualitative study
    Cromarty, I
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1996, 46 (410): : 525 - 528
  • [8] What Do Academic Physicians Think of Tai Chi? A Qualitative Study
    Huston, Patricia
    MacGuigan, Deirdre
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2021, 27 (05) : 434 - 441
  • [9] What do I-CASE tool-users think about the toolsets?
    Hawat, P
    ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDING OF THE AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1997, : 954 - 956