Comparative Study of Routing Protocols for IoT Networks

被引:0
|
作者
Verma A. [1 ]
Deswal S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Haryana, Murthal
关键词
internet of things; IoT networks; performance parameters; routing algorithms; routing approaches; routing protocols;
D O I
10.2174/1872212117666230120142358
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Internet of things (IoT) is widely used for communication between portable and intelligent heterogeneous devices, like laptops, smartphones, computers, etc. IoT networks are popular in the modern era because they allow data to be exchanged anywhere when connected to the inter-net. IoT networks have several challenges, including those related to routing, connectivity, privacy, security, and other issues. The major challenge is routing in terms of choosing the best route for sharing data in IoT networks; IoT routing algorithms use more time and energy. In this paper, we review relevent literature and patents and also various routing approaches are categorized into groups, like multicast, clustering, emergency application, traffic, location, tree, and residual energy based approach, and they are compared based on several parameters, like energy consumption, network lifetime, path length, packet delivery ratio, and network latency. In terms of performance met-rics, like energy consumption, network lifetime, reliability, efficiency, and packet delivery ratio, the comparison shows that Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL), Efficient Tree-based Self-organizing Protocol (ETSP), Collection Tree Protocol (CTP), and Fast Multi-constrained Multicast Routing Algorithms (FAMOUS) are the best protocols. The best approach is a tree-based one since it solves the larger problem in the hierarchy with the least amount of time complexity. © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 197
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cluster based Routing Protocols: A Comparative study
    Munir, Asif
    2015 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES ACCT 2015, 2015, : 590 - 594
  • [22] Comparative study of routing strategies for wireless sensor networks: Are MANET Protocols good fit?
    Gadallah, Yasser
    AD-HOC, MOBILE, AND WIRELESS NETWORKS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4104 : 5 - 18
  • [23] A Comparative Study of Existing Cluster-Based Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks
    Mishra, Pooja
    Sharma, Sanjiv
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE GENERATION COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING, 2016, 9 (07): : 43 - 52
  • [24] DEEC and EDEEC Routing Protocols for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks: A Brief Comparative Study
    Redjimi, Kenza
    Boulaiche, Mehdi
    Redjimi, Mohammed
    PROGRESSES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE & ROBOTICS: ALGORITHMS & APPLICATIONS, 2022, : 117 - 125
  • [25] Comparative study of reactive and proactive routing protocols performance in mobile ad hoc networks
    Mbarushimana, C.
    Shahrabi, A.
    21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS WORKSHOPS/SYMPOSIA, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 679 - +
  • [26] A study of routing protocols in wireless sensor networks
    Jiang, Peng
    Wen, Yu
    Wang, Jianzhong
    Shen, Xingfa
    Xue, Anke
    WCICA 2006: SIXTH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-12, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 266 - +
  • [27] Towards Better Routing Protocols for IoT
    Ali, Shafqat
    Ahmed, Adnan
    Raza, Muhammad
    2019 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, MATHEMATICS AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES (ICOMET), 2019,
  • [28] Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for IoT
    Manda, Sridhar
    Nalini, N.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS, MATERIALS AND APPLIED SCIENCE, 2018, 1952
  • [29] A comparative view of routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks
    Bayrakdar, Yonca
    Meratnia, Nirvana
    Kantarci, Aylin
    2011 IEEE - OCEANS SPAIN, 2011,
  • [30] Routing Protocols in Delay Tolerant Networks: Comparative and Empirical Analysis
    Ankita Verma
    Sanjiv Savita
    Wireless Personal Communications, 2021, 118 : 551 - 574