Gait event detection accuracy: Effects of amputee gait pattern, terrain and algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Munoz-Larrosa, Eugenia Soledad [1 ,2 ]
Riveras, Mauricio [1 ,2 ]
Oldfield, Matthew [3 ]
Shaheen, Aliah F. [3 ,4 ]
Schlotthauer, Gaston [1 ,5 ]
Catalfamo-Formento, Paola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CONICET UNER, Inst Res & Dev Bioengn & Bioinformat BB, Ruta 11,Km 10, Oro Verde, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Entre Rios, Sch Engn, Lab Res Human Movement, RA-3101 Oro Verde, Argentina
[3] Univ Surrey, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Sch Mech Engn Sci, Guildford GU2 7TE, England
[4] Brunel Univ London, Dept Life Sci, Div Sport Hlth & Exercise Sci, London UB8 3PH, England
[5] Univ Nacl Entre Rios, Lab Senales & Dinam Lineales, RA-3101 Oro Verde, Argentina
关键词
Level Ground; Slope; Ramp; Initial Contact; Foot Off; CONTACT; WALKING; IDENTIFICATION; TREADMILL; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112384
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Several kinematic-based algorithms have shown accuracy for gait event detection in unimpaired and pathological gait. However, their validation in subjects with lower limb amputation while walking on different terrains is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three kinematic-based algorithms: Coordinate-Based Algorithm (CBA), Velocity-Based Algorithm (VBA) and High-Pass Filtered Algorithms (HPA) for detection of gait events in subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation walking on different terrains. Twelve subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation, using a hydraulic ankle prosthesis, walked at self-selected walking speed, on level ground and up and down a slope. Detection of Initial Contact (IC) and Foot Off (FO) by the three algorithms for intact and prosthetic limbs was compared with detection by force platforms using the True Error (TE) (time difference in detection). Mean TE found for over 100 events analysed per condition were smaller than 40 ms for both events in all conditions (approximately 6 % of stance phase). Significant interactions (p < 0.01) were found between terrain and algorithm, limb and algorithm, and also a main effect for the algorithm. Post-hoc analyses indicate that the algorithm, the limb and the terrain had an effect on the accuracy in detection. If an accuracy of 40 ms is acceptable for the particular application, then all three algorithms can be used for event detection in amputee gait. However, if accuracy in detection of events is crucial for the intended application, an evaluation of the algorithms in pathological gait walking on the terrain of interest is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gait event detection using a multilayer neural network
    Miller, Adam
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 29 (04) : 542 - 545
  • [22] Developing a portable gait cycle detection system using an inertial sensor and evaluating the accuracy of the gait cycle detection
    Park, Min-Hwa
    Kwak, Ki-Young
    Kim, Dong-Wook
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2016, 24 : S69 - S76
  • [23] Exploration of Gait Parameters Affecting the Accuracy of Force Myography-Based Gait Phase Detection
    Jiang, X.
    Tory, L.
    Khoshnam, M.
    Chu, K. H. T.
    Menon, C.
    2018 7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB2018), 2018, : 1205 - 1210
  • [24] Feasibility of a Sensor-Based Gait Event Detection Algorithm for Triggering Functional Electrical Stimulation during Robot-Assisted Gait Training
    Schicketmueller, Andreas
    Rose, Georg
    Hofmann, Marc
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (21)
  • [25] Visual regulation of gait in uneven terrain: Age and speed effects
    Lythgo, N
    Begg, R
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2004, 12 (03) : 307 - 308
  • [26] An optimal jerk-stiffness controller for gait pattern generation in rough terrain
    Aloulou A.
    Boubaker O.
    ROBOMECH Journal, 3 (1):
  • [27] Gait event detection in laboratory and real life settings: Accuracy of ankle and waist sensor based methods
    Storm, Fabio A.
    Buckley, Christopher J.
    Mazza, Claudia
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2016, 50 : 42 - 46
  • [28] Development of a Bioimpedance and sEMG Fusion Sensor for Gait Phase Detection: Validation with a Transtibial Amputee
    Heo, Ung
    Jeong, Hyunho
    Feng, Jirou
    Cho, Junhwi
    Park, Kyungseo
    Yoon, Youngsik
    Lee, Dongyeon
    Kim, Jung
    2023 45TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY, EMBC, 2023,
  • [29] Accuracy and Precision of Equine Gait Event Detection during Walking with Limb and Trunk Mounted Inertial Sensors
    Olsen, Emil
    Andersen, Pia Haubro
    Pfau, Thilo
    SENSORS, 2012, 12 (06): : 8145 - 8156
  • [30] Biomechanic and Energetic Effects of a Quasi-Passive Artificial Gastrocnemius on Transtibial Amputee Gait
    Eilenberg, Michael F.
    Endo, Ken
    Herr, Hugh
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2018, 2018