Gait event detection accuracy: Effects of amputee gait pattern, terrain and algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Munoz-Larrosa, Eugenia Soledad [1 ,2 ]
Riveras, Mauricio [1 ,2 ]
Oldfield, Matthew [3 ]
Shaheen, Aliah F. [3 ,4 ]
Schlotthauer, Gaston [1 ,5 ]
Catalfamo-Formento, Paola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CONICET UNER, Inst Res & Dev Bioengn & Bioinformat BB, Ruta 11,Km 10, Oro Verde, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Entre Rios, Sch Engn, Lab Res Human Movement, RA-3101 Oro Verde, Argentina
[3] Univ Surrey, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Sch Mech Engn Sci, Guildford GU2 7TE, England
[4] Brunel Univ London, Dept Life Sci, Div Sport Hlth & Exercise Sci, London UB8 3PH, England
[5] Univ Nacl Entre Rios, Lab Senales & Dinam Lineales, RA-3101 Oro Verde, Argentina
关键词
Level Ground; Slope; Ramp; Initial Contact; Foot Off; CONTACT; WALKING; IDENTIFICATION; TREADMILL; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112384
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Several kinematic-based algorithms have shown accuracy for gait event detection in unimpaired and pathological gait. However, their validation in subjects with lower limb amputation while walking on different terrains is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three kinematic-based algorithms: Coordinate-Based Algorithm (CBA), Velocity-Based Algorithm (VBA) and High-Pass Filtered Algorithms (HPA) for detection of gait events in subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation walking on different terrains. Twelve subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation, using a hydraulic ankle prosthesis, walked at self-selected walking speed, on level ground and up and down a slope. Detection of Initial Contact (IC) and Foot Off (FO) by the three algorithms for intact and prosthetic limbs was compared with detection by force platforms using the True Error (TE) (time difference in detection). Mean TE found for over 100 events analysed per condition were smaller than 40 ms for both events in all conditions (approximately 6 % of stance phase). Significant interactions (p < 0.01) were found between terrain and algorithm, limb and algorithm, and also a main effect for the algorithm. Post-hoc analyses indicate that the algorithm, the limb and the terrain had an effect on the accuracy in detection. If an accuracy of 40 ms is acceptable for the particular application, then all three algorithms can be used for event detection in amputee gait. However, if accuracy in detection of events is crucial for the intended application, an evaluation of the algorithms in pathological gait walking on the terrain of interest is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robust and adaptive terrain classification and gait event detection system
    Shaikh, Usman Qamar
    Shahzaib, Muhammad
    Shakil, Sadia
    Bhatti, Farrukh A.
    Malik, Aamir Saeed
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (11)
  • [2] Gait event detection algorithm based on smart insoles
    Kim, JeongKyun
    Bae, Myung-Nam
    Lee, Kang Bok
    Hong, Sang Gi
    ETRI JOURNAL, 2020, 42 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [3] Accuracy of three methods in gait event detection during overground running
    Mo, Shiwei
    Chow, Daniel H. K.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2018, 59 : 93 - 98
  • [4] An Adaptive Method for Gait Event Detection of Gait Rehabilitation Robots
    Ye, Jing
    Wu, Hongde
    Wu, Lishan
    Long, Jianjun
    Zhang, Yuling
    Chen, Gong
    Wang, Chunbao
    Luo, Xun
    Hou, Qinghua
    Xu, Yi
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS, 2020, 14
  • [5] Gait event detection with intelligent shoes
    Huang, Bufu
    Chen, Meng
    Shi, Xi
    Xu, Yangsheng
    2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION ACQUISITION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 580 - 585
  • [6] Terrain Adaptation Gait Algorithm in a Hexapod Walking Robot
    Isvara, Yudi
    Rachmatullah, Syawaludin
    Mutijarsa, Kusprasapta
    Prabakti, Dinara Enggar
    Pragitatama, Wiharsa
    2014 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AUTOMATION ROBOTICS & VISION (ICARCV), 2014, : 1735 - 1739
  • [7] Derivative Based Gait Event Detection Algorithm Using Unfiltered Accelerometer Signals
    Escamilla-Nunez, Rafael
    Aguilar, Luis
    Ng, Gabriel
    Gouda, Aliaa
    Andrysek, Jan
    42ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY: ENABLING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR GLOBAL HEALTHCARE EMBC'20, 2020, : 4487 - 4490
  • [8] Impact of the Marker Set Configuration on the Accuracy of Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Subjects
    Visscher, Rosa M. S.
    Freslier, Marie
    Moissenet, Florent
    Sansgiri, Sailee
    Singh, Navrag B.
    Viehweger, Elke
    Taylor, William R.
    Brunner, Reinald
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [9] Automated event detection algorithms in pathological gait
    Bruening, Dustin A.
    Ridge, Sarah Trager
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2014, 39 (01) : 472 - 477
  • [10] Gait Abnormality Detection in Unilateral Trans-Tibial Amputee in Real-Time Gait Using Wearable Setup
    Rathore, Radheshyam
    Singh, Amit Kumar
    Chaudhary, Himanshu
    Kandan, Karthikeyan
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (12) : 12567 - 12573