Technology readiness level assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies

被引:9
|
作者
Bukar, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Asif, Muhammad [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Mech Engn, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Architectural Engn & Construct Management, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, IRC Sustainable Energy Syst, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
来源
关键词
Carbon capture; Carbon storage; Technology readiness level; Energy transition; Sustainable Development Goals; Decarbonisation; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MATURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114578
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The global energy sector has experienced significant expansion in recent years, driven by rising demand and technological advancements. This growth has led to both opportunities and challenges, including global warming and the need to offset global carbon emissions. A wide range of technological maturity characterizes the current state of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. To efficiently navigate and accelerate the implementation of these solutions, conducting an in-depth assessment of various CCS technologies is necessary. In the literature, maturity assessment-based study of CCS technologies exists only using expert surveys. This study aimed to conduct a technology readiness level (TRL) assessment of CCS technologies with the help of a multifaceted approach comprising a literature review, technology identification, data collection, TRL mapping, expert survey, and comparative analysis. To achieve this, 79 CCS projects from the literature were analyzed to identify growing trends in the CCS industry. The analysis shows that both pre-combustion and post-combustion capture are mature technologies achieving TRL 9, while oxy-fuel capture is ranked at TRL 7. Similarly, carbon storage technologies achieved high ranking, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and storage in saline aquifers are fully commercial and ranked at TRL 9. Enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) extraction is trailing at TRL 3 in the research phase. In addition, a total of 21 experts were surveyed, and their statements corroborate the conclusions of the literature review. The research concludes that post-combustion capture and EOR are the most popular CCS technologies, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Suitability of CO2 capture technologies for carbon capture and storage in India
    Yadav, Dharmender
    Chandel, Munish K.
    Kumar, Pramod
    GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 6 (04): : 519 - 530
  • [32] AN ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE
    Whitfield, Aidan
    HAZARDS XXII: PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2011, (156): : 1 - 7
  • [33] Technology Readiness Level as the Foundation of Human Readiness Level
    Salazar, George
    Russi-Vigoya, M. Natalia
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2021, 29 (04) : 25 - 29
  • [34] Enhancing Technology Readiness Assessment: The Engineering Severity Level Methodology and the Technical Readiness Level+ Classification
    Jones, Susannah
    IEEE Open Journal of Systems Engineering, 2024, 2 : 50 - 61
  • [35] Carbon Capture and Storage: Technologies, Policies, Economics, and Implementation Strategies
    Felder, Frank A.
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (04): : 229 - 231
  • [36] Integrating geothermal energy and carbon capture and storage technologies: A review
    Loschetter, A.
    Kervevan, C.
    Stead, R.
    Le Guenan, T.
    Dezayes, C.
    Clarke, N.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 210
  • [37] Integration of SNG plants with Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies modeling
    Bassano, Claudia
    Deiana, Paolo
    Pacetti, Lorenza
    Verdone, Nicola
    FUEL, 2015, 161 : 355 - 363
  • [38] Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Hefny, Mahmoud
    Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A.
    Elgarahy, Ahmed M.
    Rooney, David W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2021, 19 (02) : 797 - 849
  • [39] Evaluating the development of carbon capture and storage technologies in the United States
    van Alphen, Klaas
    Noothout, Paul M.
    Hekkert, Marko P.
    Turkenburg, Wim C.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (03): : 971 - 986
  • [40] Environmental Hazards Caused by Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technologies
    Rusin, Andrzej
    Stolecka, Katarzyna
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2013, 22 (01): : 205 - 211