Measuring willingness to pay for shared parking

被引:0
|
作者
Ardeshiri, Ali [1 ]
Safarighouzhdi, Farshid [2 ]
Hossein Rashidi, Taha [2 ]
机构
[1] UniSA Business, University of South Australia, Adelaide,5000, Australia
[2] Research Centre for Integrated Transport Innovation (rCITI), School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Australia
关键词
Australia - Behavioral model - Latent class - Monetary value - New South Wales - Parking facility and service - Parking policy - Shared economy - Shared parking - Willingness to pay;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study explores how individuals evaluate different shared parking features, as an emerging concept. In this paper, we develop a latent class behavioural model for a sample of 1,008 residents in New South Wales, Australia to explore different segments of taste and preference for shared parking. The outcome of this study extends our understanding about the emerging concept of shared parking by quantifying monetary value, in terms of willingness-to-pay, of different features of this new emerging phenomenon. This study contributes to the literature by providing firsthand insights about how demand for shared parking is formed and how different policy implication can be made accordingly. The results indicate that pricing persists to be the sole most effective parking policy, however non-price-related attributes can help decision makers to make more informative decision when it comes to different pricing schemes. The study also highlights that shared parking can perform a significant role in accommodating the surplus arising from the excessive parking demand and inadequate supply up to almost 40% of demand. The outcome of this study is anticipated to inform and equip city authorities with advanced knowledge about such an emerging phenomenon which can help developing regulations before the concept is out of control. Information from this study can also guide the private sector and the wider community to identify and develop opportunities related to shared parking. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 202
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Attitudes, personality traits and private parking space owners' willingness to engage in shared parking schemes: a hybrid prospect theoretic model
    Yan, Qianqian
    Feng, Tao
    Timmermans, Harry
    TRANSPORTMETRICA A-TRANSPORT SCIENCE, 2024, 20 (02)
  • [42] Is shared housing a viable economic and social housing option for young adults?: Willingness to pay for shared housing in Seoul
    Kim, Jeongseob
    Woo, Ayoung
    Cho, Gi-Hyoug
    CITIES, 2020, 102
  • [43] Layout Optimization for Shared Parking Spaces Considering Shared Parking Walking Time and Parking Fee
    Ji, Yangbeibei
    Lu, Xueqing
    Jiang, Hanwan
    Zhu, Xinyang
    Wang, Jiao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [44] Car Drivers' Willingness to Pay for Design Related Attributes of Parking Garages: Hierarchical Information Integration Approach
    van der Waerden, Peter
    Agarad, Soufyan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2019, 2673 (12) : 485 - 493
  • [45] Measuring consumer' willingness to pay for food safety certification labels of packaged rice
    Ting, Chung-Te
    Huang, Yu-Sheng
    Lin, Cheng-Te
    Hsieh, Yun
    AIMS AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, 2021, 6 (04): : 1000 - 1010
  • [47] Measuring the value of GM traits: The theory and practice of willingness-to-pay analysis
    Olubobokun, S
    Phillips, PWB
    Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods, 2004, : 61 - 72
  • [48] Measuring willingness to pay for agricultural insurance: A case study of pistachio producers in Iran
    Ezzatabadi, M. A.
    Proceedings of the IVth International Symposium on Pistachios and Almonds, 2006, (726): : 675 - 677
  • [49] Measuring specialty crop grower willingness to pay for genetic modification and genetic editing
    Abbey, Marie
    Smith, Alan G.
    Yue, Chengyan
    Marson, Corissa
    Lai, Yufeng
    Stowers, Carrie
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2024,
  • [50] Measuring patient preferences by willingness to pay to avoid: The case of acute otitis media
    Sorum, PC
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (01) : 27 - 37