System of comprehensive assessment of project risks in energy industry

被引:0
|
作者
Stroykov G.A. [1 ]
Babyr N.V. [2 ]
Ilin I.V. [3 ]
Marchenko R.S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Organization and Management Department, Saint-Petersburg Mining University
[2] Saint-Petersburg Mining University, St. Petersburg
[3] Higher school of Business and Management, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic, University Federal State Autonomous Educational, St. Petersburg
来源
International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics | 2021年 / 34卷 / 07期
关键词
Energy Industry; Investment Projects; Monte Carlo Method; Project Risks; Risk Assessment; Simulation Modeling;
D O I
10.5829/IJE.2021.34.07A.22
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The article proposes to consider the problem of comprehensive assessment of project risks as applied to the energy industry. The authors of the research focused on the description of the applied solution. A real investment project on replacement of a bark boiler at Mondi Syktyvkar enterprise was chosen as an object for testing the results. We proposed to divide the risks accompanying the project into 2 categories: Risks for which there is necessary and statistical information for their quantitative assessment and risks for which this information is absent. As a technique of a quantitative assessment of risks from the first category it is expedient to apply a method of Simulation modeling of Monte Carlo. In this case, the authors of the article conducted a significant analysis of existing methods for assessing project risks and the choice of the Monte Carlo methodology is due to the practical orientation of the study. In practice, the real enterprise is quite problematic to use more complex methods of assessment, such as methods of Real Options or methods of fuzzy logic, neural networks, etc. As a method of qualitative risk assessment (from the second category) the method of expert evaluation with subsequent calculation of risk premium in the discount rate was chosen. This method is common in practice and easy enough to implement. According to the results of the analysis (statistical and expert) the most dangerous risks of energy projects were identified: Production and technological risks (the risk of choosing the wrong technological scheme, the risk of reducing the quality of internal controls, the risk of incorrect calculation of the design capacity of energy production, the risk of industrial safety), security risks (the risk of hacking attacks on information systems of energy enterprises), as well as country risks. Among the most influential risks (based on the analysis of their impact on the main technical and economic indicators of the project) are: The risk of rising prices for purchased gas (fuel), the risk of high volatility of the dollar exchange rate. The results of the study were used in a real project and the risk assessment methodology was implemented in the project activities of Mondi Syktyvkar enterprise. © 2021 Materials and Energy Research Center. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1778 / 1784
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysing project risks in Ghana's real estate industry
    Amoatey, Charles
    Danquah, Doreen
    JOURNAL OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 16 (04) : 413 - 428
  • [32] Regional comprehensive environmental impact assessment of renewable energy system in California
    Zhang, Ning
    Zheng, Jiajia
    Song, Guanghan
    Zhao, Hailong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 376
  • [33] Study on the Comprehensive Assessment System of Distribution Network Construction Project Input Output Benefit
    Liu Hong
    Cui Wen-ting
    Zhou Xiao-min
    Liu Wei
    Qu Gao-qiang
    2017 IEEE 2ND ADVANCED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (IAEAC), 2017, : 109 - 113
  • [34] The Assessment of Construction Project Safety Management Security System Based on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation
    Liu, Hao
    Wang, Yang
    ICCREM 2017: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2017, : 262 - 271
  • [35] Optimal comprehensive assessment of multioptional investment in project
    Xiong, W
    Yang, Q
    98 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 254 - 258
  • [36] Decision support system to identify a methodology for geohazard risks assessment: SADERIVE project - Phase I
    Peloquin, S
    Gwyn, QHJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH THEMATIC CONFERENCE - GEOLOGIC REMOTE SENSING: PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS FOR REAL WORLD PROBLEMS, VOL II, 1996, : 517 - 525
  • [37] Assessment of Risks and Capabilities in an Innovative Project Quality Managing
    Korshunov, G., I
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE FAR EAST CON (ISCFEC 2018), 2018, 47 : 657 - 660
  • [38] The risks assessment of Rosia Montana mining project - Romania
    Georgescu, M.
    Avram, H.
    Bobar, H.
    Dumitrescu, I.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT IN ENERGY AND MINERAL PRODUCTION - SWEMP 2010, 2010, : 135 - 141
  • [39] System development risks and project team performance
    Jiang, J
    Klein, G
    Crampton, SM
    DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE 1998 PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 813 - 815
  • [40] An Improved Multilevel Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation to Analyse Engineering Project Risks
    Wu Chong
    Xia Han
    Wang Yafu
    Wang Ying
    Proceedings of 2008 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2, 2008, : 269 - 272