A review on development of intelligent health management technology for spacecraft control systems

被引:0
|
作者
Yuan L. [1 ,2 ]
Wang S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Institute of Control Engineering, Beijing
[2] Key Laboratory of Space Intelligent Control Technology, Beijing
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Fault diagnosis; Fault prognosis; Health management; Life assessment; Spacecraft control system;
D O I
10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.25044
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As one of the key technologies for spacecraft intelligent autonomous control, health management is an effective way to improve the security, reliability and stability of spacecraft. Based on the development trend of artificial intelligence technology and the new general architecture of spacecraft intelligent autonomous control system that is developed by our team, this paper gives a review of the status and development trend of intelligent health management technology for spacecraft control system. First, the challenges of health management technology for spacecraft control systems in the process of design, test and in-orbit operation are presented. Then, the states of the art of the health management technology based on artificial intelligence and its applications in the aerospace field are discussed in terms of fault prognosis, fault diagnosis and life assessment. Finally, possible development directions of the health management technology for spacecraft control system are summarized. © 2021, Beihang University Aerospace Knowledge Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [91] LIU Z, LI Q, MU C., A hybrid LSSVR-HMM based prognostics approach, The 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, pp. 275-278, (2012)
  • [92] QI H M, CHENG Y H, JIANG B, Et al., The residual life prediction of the satellite attitude control system based on Petri net, 2014 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference, pp. 266-270, (2014)
  • [93] TIAN J., Research on prediction of residual use life for attitude control system of satellite based on dynamic fault tree, pp. 67-82, (2016)
  • [94] QI H M, CHENG Y H, JIANG B, Et al., Residual life prediction of satellite attitude control system based on multistate failures, Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 47, 1, pp. 29-36, (2015)
  • [95] CASTET J F, SALEH J H., Single versus mixture Weibull distributions for nonparametric satellite reliability, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95, 3, pp. 295-300, (2010)
  • [96] CASTANEDA G A P, AUBRY J F, BRINZEI N., Stochastic hybrid automata model for dynamic reliability assessment, Journal of Risk and Reliability, 225, 1, pp. 28-41, (2011)
  • [97] FISCHER P M, LUDTKE D, LANGE C, Et al., Implementing model-based system engineering for the whole lifecycle of a spacecraft, CEAS Space Journal, 9, 3, pp. 351-365, (2017)
  • [98] LIU X, GUO J, GILL E., Towards model-driven development of AOCS/GNC for small satellite missions, The 65th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), (2014)
  • [99] TAO F, SUI F, LIU A, Et al., Digital twin-driven prod-uct design framework, International Journal of Production Research, 57, 12, pp. 3935-3953, (2019)
  • [100] TUEGEL E J., The airframe digital twin: some challenges to realization, Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, (2012)