Adjoint-based inversion for stress and frictional parameters in earthquake modeling

被引:1
|
作者
Stiernstrom, Vidar [1 ,2 ]
Almquist, Martin [1 ]
Dunham, Eric M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Informat Technol, POB 337, S-75105 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Geophys, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Earthquake; Inverseproblem; Rate-and-statefriction; Adjoint-based optimization; Summation-by-partsfinite difference; Dual consistent; FINITE-DIFFERENCE; DATA ASSIMILATION; WAVE-EQUATION; ROCK FRICTION; RUPTURE; SLIP; FAULTS; INTERPOLATION; SIMULATIONS; CONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113447
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We present an adjoint-based optimization method to invert for stress and frictional parameters used in earthquake modeling. The forward problem is linear elastodynamics with nonlinear rate-and-state frictional faults. The misfit functional quantifies the difference between simulated and measured particle displacements or velocities at receiver locations. The misfit may include windowing or filtering operators. We derive the corresponding adjoint problem, which is linear elasticity with linearized rate-and-state friction and, for forward problems involving fault normal stress changes, nonzero fault opening, with time-dependent coefficients derived from the forward solution. The gradient of the misfit is efficiently computed by convolving forward and adjoint variables on the fault. The method thus extends the framework of full-waveform inversion to include frictional faults with rate-and-state friction. In addition, we present a space-time dual-consistent discretization of a dynamic rupture problem with a rough fault in antiplane shear, using high-order accurate summation-by-parts finite differences in combination with explicit Runge-Kutta time integration. The dual consistency of the discretization ensures that the discrete adjoint-based gradient is the exact gradient of the discrete misfit functional as well as a consistent approximation of the continuous gradient. Our theoretical results are corroborated by inversions with synthetic data. We anticipate that adjoint-based inversion of seismic and/or geodetic data will be a powerful tool for studying earthquake source processes; it can also be used to interpret laboratory friction experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adjoint-based inverse analysis of windkessel parameters for patient-specific vascular models
    Ismail, Mahmoud
    Wall, Wolfgang A.
    Gee, Michael W.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2013, 244 : 113 - 130
  • [32] Adjoint-based targeting of observations for FASTEX cyclones
    Langland, RH
    Rohaly, GD
    SEVENTH CONFERENCE ON MESOSCALE PROCESSES, 1996, : 369 - 371
  • [33] Adjoint-based optimization of active nanophotonic devices
    Wang, Jiahui
    Shi, Yu
    Hughes, Tyler
    Zhao, Zhexin
    Fan, Shanhui
    2019 CONFERENCE ON LASERS AND ELECTRO-OPTICS (CLEO), 2019,
  • [34] Adjoint-Based Optimization for the Venturi Mixer of A Burner
    Xu, Min
    Radwan, Akram
    Xia, Yu
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2024, 146 (11):
  • [35] Adjoint-based optimization of PDEs in moving domains
    Protas, Bartosz
    Liao, Wenyuan
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2008, 227 (04) : 2707 - 2723
  • [36] Adjoint-based interfacial control of viscous drops
    Fikl, Alexandru
    Bodony, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2021, 911
  • [37] Adjoint-based forecast sensitivities of Typhoon Rusa
    Kim, Hyun Mee
    Jung, Byoung-Joo
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (21)
  • [38] Adjoint-based optimization of displacement ventilation flow
    Nabi, S.
    Grover, P.
    Caulfield, C. P.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 124 : 342 - 356
  • [39] ADJOINT-BASED OPTIMIZATION METHODS FOR FLOWS PROBLEMS
    Grahs, Thorsten
    Turnow, Johann
    VII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN MARINEENGINEERING (MARINE2017), 2017, : 220 - 230
  • [40] Adjoint-based sampling methods for electromagnetic scattering
    Egger, H.
    Hanke, M.
    Schneider, C.
    Schoeberl, J.
    Zaglmayr, S.
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2010, 26 (07)