Comparison of machine learning approach to other commonly used unfolding methods

被引:0
|
作者
Baron P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Joint Laboratory of Optics of Palacký University, Institute of Physics AS CR, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 12, Olomouc
来源
Acta Phys Pol B | / 8卷 / 863-869期
关键词
Machine learning;
D O I
10.5506/APHYSPOLB.52.863
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Unfolding in high energy physics represents the correction of measured spectra in data for the finite detector efficiency, acceptance, and resolution from the detector to particle level. Recent machine learning approaches provide unfolding on an event-by-event basis allowing to simultaneously unfold a large number of variables and thus to cover a wider region of the features that affect detector response. This study focuses on a simple comparison of commonly used methods in RooUnfold package to the machine learning package OmniFold. © 2021 Jagellonian University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 869
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH TO OTHER COMMONLY USED UNFOLDING METHODS
    Baron, Petr
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B, 2021, 52 (08): : 863 - 869
  • [2] Comparison of a novel methadone rotation method with other commonly used methods
    Cunningham, Elaine
    Dibiagio, Nicole
    O' Connell, Florry
    Flannery, Maedhbh
    Cronin, Michael
    Murphy, Marie
    O'Leary, Mary Jane
    Kiely, Fiona
    Lowney, Aoife C.
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024,
  • [3] Comparison of the CatBoost Classifier with other Machine Learning Methods
    Ibrahim, Abdullahi A.
    Ridwan, Raheem L.
    Muhammed, Muhammed M.
    Abdulaziz, Rabiat O.
    Saheed, Ganiyu A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (11) : 738 - 748
  • [4] Development and comparison of deep learning toolkit with other machine learning methods
    Mitrofanov, Artem
    Korotcov, Alexandru
    Tkachenko, Valery
    Ekins, Sean
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254
  • [5] Comparison of statistical methods commonly used in predictive modelling
    Muñoz, J
    Felicísimo, AM
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (02) : 285 - 292
  • [6] A comparison of two commonly used methods of weight estimation
    Argall, JAW
    Wright, N
    Mackway-Jones, K
    Jackson, R
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2003, 88 (09) : 789 - 790
  • [7] PLOIDY DETERMINATION - A COMPARISON OF 4 COMMONLY USED METHODS
    PULLMAN, J
    WILBURN, S
    BUR, M
    REALE, F
    WODA, B
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1990, 62 (01) : A81 - A81
  • [8] COMPARISON OF A WET PRESSURE DIGESTION METHOD WITH OTHER COMMONLY USED WET AND DRY-ASHING METHODS
    ADRIAN, WJ
    ANALYST, 1973, 98 (1164) : 213 - 216
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF THREE COMMONLY USED METHODS FOR TREATING NO PREFERENCE VOTES
    Ennis, John M.
    Ennis, Daniel M.
    JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 2012, 27 (02) : 123 - 129