Intelligent monitoring approach for pipeline defect detection from MFL inspection

被引:1
|
作者
Ehteram S. [1 ]
Moussavi S.Z. [2 ]
Sadeghi M. [1 ]
Mahdavi S.M. [1 ]
Kazemi A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Control and Commissioning (CC), MAPNA Electrical and Control Engineering and Manufacturing Co. (MECO) MAPNA Blvd, Fardis, Karaj 31176, 6th Km of Malard Road
[2] Department of Electrical Engineering Shahid rajeee University, Lavizan, Tehran
关键词
Artificial neural network (ANN); Magnetic flux leakage (MFL); Non destructive testing (NDT); Pattern recognition;
D O I
10.4156/jcit.vol5.issue2.5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial Neural Networks(ANNS) have top level of capability to progress the estimation of cracks in metal tubes. The aim of this paper is to propose an algorithm to identify modeled cracks by magnetic flux leakage inspection in Non Destructive Testing (NDT) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6]. The analysis is carried out with a simulated database of signals in which the depth of the crack, its width, shape, And geometric dimension of the detection process, is allowed to change. The simulated signal is input to the network, after a reduction process in which the main features of the signal are extracted. Feature extractors are used in pattern recognition area due to their advantages in representing data. With this approach classifier's job became easier and more effective. The main goal of the feature extractor is to reflect the characteristics of an object in a given dataset. In this way feature extractor simplify the amount of resources required to describe a large dataset accurately. This paper presents the results of employing different kinds of feature extraction functions and classification and provides compression between them. As the output of ANN, we shall justify if any care in meta lto indicate whether the input signal is crack or not. The analysis based on the neural network and feature extractor functions is shown to be quite top probability of detection.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Defect reconstruction of submarine oil pipeline from MFL signals using genetic simulated annealing algorithm
    Han, Wenhua
    Que, Peiwen
    JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, 2006, 49 (03) : 145 - 150
  • [32] An Anchor-Free Pipeline MFL Image Detection Method
    Han, Fucheng
    Lang, Xianming
    Liu, Mingyang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2023, 72
  • [33] PIPELINE INSPECTION - INTELLIGENT PIGS PROVE THEIR VALUE
    SHANNON, RWE
    ERDOL & KOHLE ERDGAS PETROCHEMIE, 1988, 41 (09): : 332 - 334
  • [34] Pipeline risk management based on intelligent inspection
    Gao Fuqing
    Yuan Lihai
    Zhang Jixian
    Advanced Computer Technology, New Education, Proceedings, 2007, : 86 - 89
  • [35] Intelligent railroad inspection and monitoring
    Qian, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10
  • [36] Robotic MFL Probe Design for Inspection in Structural Health Monitoring System
    Qidwai, Uvais
    Akbar, Muhammed Ali
    Maqbool, Mohammed
    2018 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL SYSTEM, COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (ICCSCE 2018), 2018, : 5 - 9
  • [37] Pipeline corrosion defect parameterisation with magnetic flux leakage inspection: a contextual representation approach
    Peng, Xiang
    Liu, Huan
    Siggers, Kevin
    Liu, Zheng
    INSIGHT, 2021, 63 (02) : 95 - 101
  • [38] A steel surface defect inspection approach towards smart industrial monitoring
    Ruiyang Hao
    Bingyu Lu
    Ying Cheng
    Xiu Li
    Biqing Huang
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2021, 32 : 1833 - 1843
  • [39] A steel surface defect inspection approach towards smart industrial monitoring
    Hao, Ruiyang
    Lu, Bingyu
    Cheng, Ying
    Li, Xiu
    Huang, Biqing
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2021, 32 (07) : 1833 - 1843
  • [40] Quick Reconstruction of Arbitrary Pipeline Defect Profiles From MFL Measurements Employing Modified Harmony Search Algorithm
    Li, Fangming
    Feng, Jian
    Zhang, Huaguang
    Liu, Jinhai
    Lu, Senxiang
    Ma, Dazhong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2018, 67 (09) : 2200 - 2213