Techno-economic analysis and comparison of oil shale-to-liquid fuels and coal-to-liquid fuels processes

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Zhou, Huairong
[2] Yang, Qingchun
[3] Yang, Siyu
来源
Yang, Siyu (cesyyang@scut.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Materials China卷 / 35期
关键词
Shale oil - Liquids - Economic analysis - Coal - Cost benefit analysis - Investments - Petroleum transportation - Coal deposits - Liquid fuels;
D O I
10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.05.020
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Liquid fuels are widely used in transportation, logistics, and lives. However the production is heavily dependent on oil. In China oil resources are relatively scarce. Import dependence is as high as 60%. To reduce dependence on oil, the production of liquid fuels from alternative energy resources, especially from oil shale and coal is increasing in China. However, few literatures can be found for analysis and comparison of oil shale-to-liquid (STL) and coal-to-liquid (CTL) processes. This paper models and simulates a STL process and a CTL process. Based on the models, analysis of the two processes is made from energy efficiency, capital investment, and production cost. Energy efficiency of STL process is lower by about 5%, compared to CTL process. This is because STL process has lower utilization rate of raw material and product yield. Total capital investment of STL process is 63.34 CNY/GJ, 70% lower than that of CTL process, because this process has simple flow scheme and lower equipment investment. However, raw material consumption of STL process is much higher. Producing 1t liquid fuels consumes 24.5 t oil shale. This makes production cost of STL process only lower by 6% compared to CTL process. © 2016, Chemical Industry Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF SHORT-TERM PRODUCTION OF RENEWABLE JET FUELS
    de Jong, S.
    Hoefnagels, R.
    Faaij, A.
    Slade, R.
    Mawhood, R.
    Junginger, M.
    PAPERS OF THE 23RD EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2015, : 995 - 996
  • [42] Mild catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for production of transportation fuels: a techno-economic analysis
    Thilakaratne, Rajeeva
    Brown, Tristan
    Li, Yihua
    Hu, Guiping
    Brown, Robert
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2014, 16 (02) : 627 - 636
  • [43] TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF HYDROGEN AND AMMONIA AS LOW CARBON FUELS FOR POWER GENERATION
    Goldmeer, Jeffrey
    Buck, Caroline
    Suleiman, Baha
    Selim, Hatem
    Tayebi, Kamel
    Agostinelli, Gian-Luigi
    Dawood, Alaaeldin
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME TURBO EXPO 2023: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, GT2023, VOL 2, 2023,
  • [44] Techno-economic analysis of renewable fuels for ships carrying bulk cargo in Europe
    Boris Stolz
    Maximilian Held
    Gil Georges
    Konstantinos Boulouchos
    Nature Energy, 2022, 7 : 203 - 212
  • [45] Techno-economic analysis of renewable fuels for ships carrying bulk cargo in Europe
    Stolz, Boris
    Held, Maximilian
    Georges, Gil
    Boulouchos, Konstantinos
    NATURE ENERGY, 2022, 7 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [46] Techno-economic and environmental comparison of processes for the production of grape oil
    Fonseca-Perez, Rosa Maria
    Almena, Alberto
    Ramirez-Marquez, Cesar
    Bonilla-Petriciolet, Adrian
    Martin, Mariano
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 441
  • [47] A Nuclear Renewable Oil Shale System for Economic Dispatchable Low-Carbon Electricity and Liquid Fuels
    Curtis, D. J.
    Forsberg, C. W.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 195 (03) : 335 - 352
  • [48] Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis for Direct Catalytic Conversion of CO2 to Methanol and Liquid/High-Calorie-SNG Fuels
    Atsbha, Tesfalem Aregawi
    Yoon, Taeksang
    Yoo, Byung-Hoon
    Lee, Chul-Jin
    CATALYSTS, 2021, 11 (06)
  • [49] Modeling and techno-economic analysis for comprehensive utilization process of oil shale
    Qian, Y. (ceyuqian@scut.edu.cn), 1600, Materials China (65):
  • [50] Techno-economic assessment of alternative fuels in second-generation carbon capture and storage processes
    Martin Haaf
    Peter Ohlemüller
    Jochen Ströhle
    Bernd Epple
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2020, 25 : 149 - 164