"Best" Iterative Coupled-Cluster Triples Model? More Evidence for 3CC

被引:1
|
作者
Teke, Nakul K. [1 ]
Melekamburath, Ajay [1 ]
Gaudel, Bimal [1 ]
Valeev, Edward F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Chem, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A | 2024年 / 128卷 / 45期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURE; QUANTUM-CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR-SYSTEMS; HARTREE-FOCK; OPEN-SHELL; WAVE; SINGLE; APPROXIMATION; FACTORIZATION;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jpca.4c04667
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To follow up on the unexpectedly good performance of several coupled-cluster models with approximate inclusion of 3-body clusters [ we performed a more complete assessment of the 3CC method [ for accurate computational thermochemistry in the standard HEAT framework. New spin-integrated implementation of the 3CC method applicable to closed- and open-shell systems utilizes a new automated toolchain for derivation, optimization, and evaluation of operator algebra in many-body electronic structure. We found that with a double-zeta basis set the 3CC correlation energies and their atomization energy contributions are almost always more accurate (with respect to the CCSDTQ reference) than the CCSDT model as well as the standard CCSD(T) model. The mean absolute errors in cc-pVDZ {3CC, CCSDT, and CCSD(T)} electronic (per valence electron) and atomization energies relative to the CCSDTQ reference for the HEAT data set [, were {24, 70, 122} mu E h/e and {0.46, 2.00, 2.58} kJ/mol, respectively. The mean absolute errors in the complete-basis-set limit {3CC, CCSDT, and CCSD(T)} atomization energies relative to the HEAT model reference, were {0.52, 2.00, and 1.07} kJ/mol, The significant and systematic reduction of the error by the 3CC method and its lower cost than CCSDT suggests it as a viable candidate for post-CCSD(T) thermochemistry applications, as well as the preferred alternative to CCSDT in general.
引用
收藏
页码:9819 / 9828
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Two new classes of non-iterative coupled-cluster methods derived from the method of moments of coupled-cluster equations
    Loch, Marta W.
    Lodriguito, Maricris D.
    Piecuch, Piotr
    Gour, Jeffrey R.
    MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 2006, 104 (13-14) : 2149 - 2172
  • [32] Application of the coupled-cluster CC(P;Q) approaches to the magnesium dimer
    Yuwono, Stephen H.
    Magoulas, Ilias
    Shen, Jun
    Piecuch, Piotr
    MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 2019, 117 (9-12) : 1486 - 1506
  • [33] Coupled-cluster corrected MR-CISD method with noniterative evaluation of connected triples
    Meissner, Leszek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 2008, 108 (12) : 2199 - 2210
  • [34] Formulation and implementation of a relativistic unrestricted coupled-cluster method including noniterative connected triples
    Visscher, L
    Lee, TJ
    Dyall, KG
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 105 (19): : 8769 - 8776
  • [35] THE 2ND-ORDER APPROXIMATE COUPLED-CLUSTER SINGLES AND DOUBLES MODEL CC2
    CHRISTIANSEN, O
    KOCH, H
    JORGENSEN, P
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1995, 243 (5-6) : 409 - 418
  • [36] Geometry optimizations with the coupled-cluster model CC2 using the resolution-of-the-identity approximation
    Hättig, C
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 118 (17): : 7751 - 7761
  • [37] Coupled-cluster treatment of the XY-model
    Farnell, DJJ
    Kruger, SE
    Parkinson, JB
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 1997, 9 (36) : 7601 - 7608
  • [38] COUPLED-CLUSTER METHOD FOR AN INCOMPLETE MODEL SPACE
    KUCHARSKI, SA
    BARTLETT, RJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 1992, : 107 - 115
  • [39] CLUSTER RELATIONS FOR MULTIREFERENCE COUPLED-CLUSTER THEORIES - A MODEL STUDY
    JANKOWSKI, K
    PALDUS, J
    WASILEWSKI, J
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 95 (05): : 3549 - 3561
  • [40] Towards Cross-Platform Portability of Coupled-Cluster Methods with Perturbative Triples using SYCL
    Bagusetty, Abhishek
    Panyala, Ajay
    Brown, Gordon
    Kirk, Jack
    2022 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PERFORMANCE, PORTABILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY IN HPC (P3HPC), 2022, : 81 - 88