Does environmental policy stringency reduce trade in energy resources? Insights from coal, petroleum, and gas

被引:4
|
作者
Usman A. [1 ]
Ullah S. [2 ]
Ozturk I. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Sohail S. [6 ]
Sohail M.T. [7 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, Government College University, Faisalabad
[2] Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University, Beirut
[3] College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah, Sharjah
[4] Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Nisantasi University, Istanbul
[5] Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung
[6] Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Islamabad
[7] Centre for Sustainable Energy and Economic Development, Gulf University for Science and Technology
关键词
Coal; Energy resources; Environmental policy stringency; Gas; Nonlinear CS-ARDL; Oil; Trade;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104679
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Stringent Environmental policies are widely acknowledged as a significant policy option to control the harmful effects of environmental degradation. Restricting trade in energy commodities helps reduce the consumption of fossil fuels and thus improve environmental quality. Within the framework of new trade theory, the analysis intends to investigate the influence of environmental policy stringency on trade in conventional energy commodities (coal, petroleum, and gas) in the top polluted economies of the world from 1991 to 2021. Additionally, the study uses the asymmetry assumption compared to earlier research. For empirical investigation, the analysis applied the novel nonlinear CS-ARDL model that can deal with the issue of cross-sectional dependence and provide robust short and long-run estimates. Findings of the nonlinear model suggest that a positive shock in environmental policy stringency restricts trade in energy commodities in the long run, whereas a negative shock in environmental policy stringency does not exert any noticeable effect on these commodities. In the short run, a positive shock in environmental policy stringency exhibits significantly negative effects in mostly energy commodities. Energy demand and financial development promote trade in energy commodities in the nonlinear model, and the real exchange rate restricts trade in these commodities. Thus, policymakers should introduce strict environmental policies to limit the consumption of fossil fuels and promote clean and green energy sources and sustainable development. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does nuclear energy reduce consumption-based carbon emissions: The role of environmental taxes and trade globalization in highest carbon emitting countries
    Mehboob, Muhammad Yasir
    Ma, Benjiang
    Sadiq, Muhammad
    Zhang, Yunsheng
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 56 (01) : 180 - 188
  • [42] Does Environmental Policy Promote Energy Efficiency? Evidence From China in the Context of Developing Green Finance
    Peng, Jiaying
    Zheng, Yuhang
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [43] Linking per capita income, renewable energy, natural resources, trade, and Urbanisation to material footprint: insights from Saudi Arabia
    Dada, James Temitope
    Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh
    ENERGY NEXUS, 2024, 13
  • [44] Does ideology influence the ambition level of climate and renewable energy policy? Insights from four European countries
    Thonig, Richard
    Del Rio, Pablo
    Kiefer, Christoph
    Lazaro Touza, Lara
    Escribano, Gonzalo
    Lechon, Yolanda
    Spaeth, Leonhard
    Wolf, Ingo
    Lilliestam, Johan
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2021, 16 (01) : 4 - 22
  • [45] Does green location-oriented policy enhance ecological resources and reduce air pollution? Empirical analysis from counties in China
    Chen, Shuai
    Hou, Mengyang
    Ding, Zhenmin
    Yao, Shunbo
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 349
  • [46] Does green location-oriented policy enhance ecological resources and reduce air pollution? Empirical analysis from counties in China
    Chen, Shuai
    Hou, Mengyang
    Ding, Zhenmin
    Yao, Shunbo
    Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 349
  • [47] How does coal consumption constraint policy affect electrical energy efficiency? Evidence from 30 Chinese provinces
    Xu, Boyu
    Su, Zhifang
    Cui, Xin
    Cao, Shaopeng
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [48] Assessment of the role of renewable energy consumption and trade policy on environmental degradation using innovation accounting: Evidence from the US
    Usman, Ojonugwa
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 150 : 266 - 277
  • [49] How does coal consumption constraint policy affect electrical energy efficiency? Evidence from 30 Chinese provinces
    Boyu Xu
    Zhifang Su
    Xin Cui
    Shaopeng Cao
    Energy Efficiency, 2022, 15
  • [50] Does environmental policy matter for renewable energy production and economic activity? Evidence from Granger causality in quantiles
    Lee, Chi-Chuan
    Li, Yong-Yi
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 81 : 225 - 237