Blade element momentum theory extended to model low Reynolds number propeller performance

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] MacNeill, R.
[2] Verstraete, D.
来源
| 1600年 / Cambridge University Press卷 / 121期
关键词
Angle of attack - Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) - Momentum - Fighter aircraft - Antennas - Propellers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Propellers are the predominant propulsion source for small unmanned aerial vehicles. At low advance ratios, large sections of the propeller blade can be stalled, and the Reynolds number faced by each blade can be low. This leads to difficulties in modelling propeller performance, as the aerodynamic models coupled with blade element methods usually only provide aerodynamic data for an assumed aerofoil section, for a small angle-of-attack range and for a single Reynolds number, while rotational effects are often ignored. This is specifically important at low advance ratios, and a consistent evaluation of the applicability of various methods to improve aerodynamic modelling is not available. To provide a systematic appraisal, three-dimensional (3D) scanning is used to obtain the aerofoil sections that make up a propeller blade. An aerodynamic database is formed using each extracted aerofoil section, across a wide range of angles of attack and Reynolds numbers. These databases are then modified to include the effects of rotation. When compared with experimental results, significant improvement in modelling accuracy is shown at low advance ratios relative to a generic blade element-momentum model, particularly for smaller propellers. Notably, when considering small propeller performance, efficiency modelling is improved from within 30% relative to experimental data to within 5% with the use of the extended blade element momentum theory method. The results show that combining Viterna and Corrigan flat plate theory with the Corrigan and Schillings stall delay model consistently yields the closest match with experimental data. © Copyright 2017 Royal Aeronautical Society.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mathematical Model of a Monocopter Based on Unsteady Blade-Element Momentum Theory
    Matic, Gasper
    Topic, Marko
    Jankovec, Marko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (06): : 1905 - 1913
  • [22] A near wake model for trailing vorticity compared with the blade element momentum theory
    Madsen, HA
    Rasmussen, F
    [J]. WIND ENERGY, 2004, 7 (04) : 325 - 341
  • [23] Two-sphere low-Reynolds-number propeller
    Najafi, Ali
    Zargar, Rojman
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 81 (06):
  • [24] Assessment of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes/Blade Element Theory Body Force Method for Propeller Modeling
    Pantel, Hugues
    Falissard, Fabrice
    Dufour, Guillaume
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2024, 62 (02) : 758 - 775
  • [25] Prediction of the Propeller Performance at Different Reynolds Number Regimes with RANS
    Baltazar, Joao
    Rijpkema, Douwe
    de Campos, Jose Falcao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [26] Blade element momentum theory for a skewed coaxial turbine
    Elfering, Kelsey
    Metoyer, Rodney
    Chatterjee, Punnag
    Mazzoleni, Andre
    Bryant, Matthew
    Granlund, Kenneth
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 269
  • [27] Rotor Design Method for a Propeller-Type Wind Turbine that Combines Optimization Method with the Blade Element Momentum Theory
    Nishi Y.
    Mori N.
    Inagaki T.
    [J]. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, 2023, 16 (01) : 34 - 52
  • [28] Generalized flight dynamic model of quadrotor using hybrid blade element momentum theory
    [J]. 1600, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (55):
  • [29] Generalized Flight Dynamic Model of Quadrotor Using Hybrid Blade Element Momentum Theory
    Shastry, Abhishek Kumar
    Kothari, Mangal
    Abhishek, Abhishek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2018, 55 (05): : 2161 - 2167
  • [30] Low Reynolds Number Effects on the Separation and Wake of a Compressor Blade
    Liu, Qiang
    Ager, Will
    Hall, Cesare
    Wheeler, Andrew P. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 144 (10):