A Zonal Transmission Pricing Approach for Electricity Market in China

被引：0
|
作者：
Chen Z. [1 ]
Xiao J. [2 ]
Jing Z. [2 ]
Zhang X. [1 ]
Zhang H. [2 ]
Leng Y. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Southern Power Grid Research Institute, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province
[2] School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, Guangdong Province
来源：
Dianwang Jishu/Power System Technology | 2017年 / 41卷 / 07期
关键词：
Electricity market; Interconnection lines; Modified postage-stamp method; Power flow tracing; Zonal transmission pricing;
D O I：
10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2016.2461
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to develop a suitable transmission pricing method for China, the paper analyzes foreign transmission pricing methods. Transmission network charging method in UK is to formulate a uniform price for whole country without considering interconnection lines. In the United States, transmission costs are shared with postage-stamp method within each transmission owner's region of PJM, not used to guide transmission layout. There are a lot of interconnection lines in China, and economic levels and power grid structures of different regions are very different. Focusing on these features of power grid in China, a zonal transmission pricing approach is thoroughly studied. Interconnection lines between regions are equivalent to generator or load to achieve regional decoupling. Locational transmission charges in the regions are calculated in accordance with UK transmission pricing method, and non-locational transmission charges are calculated using modified postage-stamp method. The cost after equivalency is recovered with power flow tracing method. Example results show that the proposed method can reasonably allocate transmission costs, providing ideas for zonal pricing and guidance information on power grid planning. © 2017, Power System Technology Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：2124 / 2130
页数：6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] Radzi N.H., Bansal R.C., Dong Z.Y., Et al., An efficient distribution factors enhanced transmission pricing method for Australian NEM transmission charging scheme, Renewable Energy, 53, 9, pp. 319-328, (2013)
  • [12] Rubino A., Cuomo M., A regulatory assessment of the Electricity Merchant Transmission Investment in EU, Energy Policy, 85, 29, pp. 319-328, (2015)
  • [13] Lei X., Liu F., Zhou J., Et al., Analysis on the internal electricity market reform of EU countries, Power System Technology, 38, 2, pp. 431-439, (2014)
  • [14] ITC monitoring report 2013, (2013)
  • [15] Gao X., Peng J., Allocation of cross-regional and cross-provincial transmission cost to trade directly, Power System Protection and Control, 40, 7, pp. 112-116, (2012)
  • [16] Wang Q., Zhang L., Xie G., Et al., A transmission pricing mechanism for cross-regional electricity trading, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 34, 13, pp. 11-15, (2010)
  • [17] Gao X., Zheng H., Pricing and benefit estimation method for trans-province transmission based on power flow tracing, Electric Power, 47, 12, pp. 133-136, (2014)
  • [18] Bialek J., Topological generation and load distribution factors for supplement charge allocation in transmission open access, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 12, 3, pp. 1185-1193, (1997)
  • [19] Jing Z., Liao M., Nie G., Et al., A source-sink analysis method for maximizing social surplus in transmission fixed cost allocation, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 37, 23, pp. 71-77, (2013)
12