Algorithmic Dispute Resolution-The Automation of Professional Dispute Resolution Using AI and Blockchain Technologies

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Barnett, Jeremy
[2] Treleaven, Philip
来源
Treleaven, Philip (p.treleaven@ucl.ac.uk) | 2018年 / Oxford University Press卷 / 61期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Legal Services industries are entering a period of major disruption caused by new legal technologies (LawTech), such as artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT) and Blockchain. An area already undergoing major innovation is alternative dispute resolution (Alternative Dispute Resolution (2017) Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative-dispute-resolution), especially automated online dispute resolution (Online Dispute Resolution (2017) Wikipedia, https://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/Online-dispute-resolution; Katsh, E. and Rifkin, J. (2001) Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. Jossey-Bass Wiley, New Jersey). In terms of LawTech, we broadly divide online dispute resolution into (a) Consumer ODRï¿uses technology to facilitate the resolution of disputes between ecommerce parties, typically online suppliers and consumers; (b) Judicial ODRï¿covers any means of settling 'ordinary' disputes where there is a hearing (using technology) but outside of the courtroom, such as divorce or personal injury cases; and what we refer to as (c) Corporate ODRï¿the use of technology to manage the resolution of any contractual disputes that may emerge from major multi-partner projects or financial transactions. This paper focuses on ODR and specifically the future use of automating anticipatory Corporate dispute resolution using AI and blockchain technologies. The paper describes the legal sector, and how it is being radically transformed by computer science. © 2018 The British Computer Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dispute Resolution in Voting
    Basin, David
    Radomirovic, Sasa
    Schmid, Lara
    2020 IEEE 33RD COMPUTER SECURITY FOUNDATIONS SYMPOSIUM (CSF 2020), 2020, : 1 - 16
  • [32] ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
    RIGBY, KJ
    LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW, 1984, 44 (06): : 1725 - 1752
  • [33] DISPUTE RESOLUTION RETROSPECTIVE
    WAHRHAFTIG, P
    CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 1981, 27 (01) : 99 - 105
  • [34] Dispute resolution in the WTO
    Cameron, J
    INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE HAGUE'S 750TH ANNIVERSARY, 1999, : 293 - 296
  • [35] Dispute Board Resolution
    Azevedo, Gustavo
    da Cunha, Leonardo Carneiro
    REVISTA ACADEMICA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DO RECIFE, 2024, 96 (02): : 213 - 223
  • [36] Alternative Dispute Resolution
    Strazisar, Borut
    PRAVO-ZHURNAL VYSSHEI SHKOLY EKONOMIKI, 2018, (03): : 214 - 233
  • [37] Principles of Dispute Resolution
    Charlton, Ruth
    AUSTRALASIAN DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (01): : 71 - 72
  • [38] PRIVATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
    PHILLIPS, BA
    JUDICATURE, 1985, 68 (7-8) : 260 - 260
  • [39] Alternative dispute resolution
    DiCesare, CB
    MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1996, 119 (1-2) : 79 - 80
  • [40] The limits of dispute resolution
    不详
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2001, 31 (06) : 10 - 10