Privacy and territoriality issues in an online social learning portal

被引:1
|
作者
Anwar M. [1 ]
Brusilovsky P. [2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina A and T State University, Greensboro, NC
[2] University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
关键词
Human Factors; Online Learning; Privacy; Social Learning; Territoriality;
D O I
10.4018/IJISP.2017010101
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Following the popularity of Wikipedia, community authoring systems are increasingly in use as content sharing outlets. As such, a Web-based portal for sharing of user-generated content (e.g., course notes, quiz answers, etc.) shows prospect to be a great tool for social E-Learning. Among others, students are expected to be active contributors in such systems in order to offer and receive peer-help. However, privacy and territoriality concerns can be potential barriers to wide adoption of such technology. Understanding the preference for sharing learning content is the first step to address privacy and territoriality concerns of content providers. The authors conduct a survey among students in four university courses in order to learn their preference for sharing notes and quiz answers with three target groups: Instructor, peer, and stranger (i.e., someone outside their class). The authors also examine the preference for acceptable method of sharing by inquiring about three methods: "anonymous sharing," "pseudonymous sharing," and "sharing with name". They further investigate the importance of "content type," "sharing method," and "accessor type" on the preference for sharing. The survey also reveals respondents' self-reported reasons for controlling access to their generated learning content. The survey data indicate that even though the respondents have various levels of concerns, almost all of them are willing to share. The authors observe relationships between content type and respondents' preference over each of these parameters: Accessor type, commentator type, and sharing method. © 2017, IGI Global.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Social Learning and Learning to Be Social: From Online Instruction to Online Education
    Zhao, Yong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2020, 127 (01) : 137 - 142
  • [42] DISTINGUISHING TERRITORIALITY AND PRIVACY - 2 STUDIES
    EDNEY, JJ
    BUDA, MA
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 1976, 4 (04) : 283 - 296
  • [43] Strategies for Privacy Negotiation in Online Social Networks
    Kekulluoglu, Dilara
    Kokciyan, Nadin
    Yolum, Pinar
    ECAI 2016: 22ND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 285 : 1608 - 1609
  • [44] Privacy and Security Issues in Deep Learning: A Survey
    Liu, Ximeng
    Xie, Lehui
    Wang, Yaopeng
    Zou, Jian
    Xiong, Jinbo
    Ying, Zuobin
    Vasilakos, Athanasios V.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 4566 - 4593
  • [45] Privacy leakage analysis in online social networks
    Li, Yan
    Li, Yingjiu
    Yan, Qiang
    Deng, Robert H.
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2015, 49 : 239 - 254
  • [46] SECURITY AND PRIVACY IN ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS: A SURVEY
    Joshi, Prateek
    Kuo, C. -C. Jay
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA AND EXPO (ICME), 2011,
  • [47] A survey on privacy in decentralized online social networks
    De Salve, Andrea
    Mori, Paolo
    Ricci, Laura
    COMPUTER SCIENCE REVIEW, 2018, 27 : 154 - 176
  • [48] Measuring Privacy Leaks in Online Social Networks
    Srivastava, Agrima
    Geethakumari, G.
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), 2013, : 2095 - 2100
  • [49] Security Issues and Privacy Preserving in Machine Learning
    Wei L.
    Chen C.
    Zhang L.
    Li M.
    Chen Y.
    Wang Q.
    Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development, 2020, 57 (10): : 2066 - 2085
  • [50] A Survey on Privacy and Security Issues in Federated Learning
    Xiao X.
    Tang Z.
    Xiao B.
    Li K.-L.
    Jisuanji Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Computers, 2023, 46 (05): : 1019 - 1044