Application and research on responses of large space structure under multi-support seismic excitation

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Feng [1 ]
Zhang, Gaoming [1 ]
Zhao, Pengfei [1 ]
机构
[1] China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China
关键词
Earthquakes - Wave propagation - Seismic response - Space platforms - Finite element method - Space applications;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Based on the 'Code for seismic design of buildings (2010)', seismic analysis under multi-support excitation should be done to structures with large dimension. The time-history seismic analysis method is popular among the main methods used for multi-support seismic analysis. In confirming the multi-support earthquake wave, the traveling wave effect and local site effect are two critical factors. Generally, there are two methods to make multi-support excitation analysis in finite element program. One is the compulsory boundary condition method, and the other is the big-mass method. The paper suggests taking the overload element and overload proportion as the evaluation index to the influence of multi-support seismic analysis. At the same time, some common conclusions are summarized in the paper based on the analysis experience of some projects. Such conclusions include that the torsion effect will be increased under multi-support seismic analysis and then result in adverse effect on the corner and side members. The earthquake input synchronization will be reduced under multi-support seismic analysis and then decrease the structure translational displacement. Generally, the influence of multi-support seismic analysis will be increased along with the reduction of traveling wave velocity while be decreased along with the increase of the building height.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 65
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dynamic analysis of a train-bridge system under multi-support seismic excitations
    Zhang, Nan
    Xia, He
    De Roeck, Guido
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (11) : 2181 - 2188
  • [42] Dynamic analysis of a train-bridge system under multi-support seismic excitations
    Nan Zhang
    He Xia
    Guido De Roeck
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2010, 24 : 2181 - 2188
  • [43] Seismic analysis of two typical spatial structures under multi-support vertical excitations
    Space Structures Research Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
    Gongcheng Lixue, 2007, 2 (85-90):
  • [44] The Dynamic Response Analysis of Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipeline with Multi-support Seismic Excitation
    Dai, Jianbo
    Zhang, Yumin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIELD EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE 2017, 2019, : 1468 - 1477
  • [45] Comparison of random vibration methods for multi-support seismic excitation analysis of long-span bridges
    Soyluk, K
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2004, 26 (11) : 1573 - 1583
  • [46] The steel structure system comparison of Hefei Xinqiao Airport Terminal based on the seismic response under multi-support excitations
    Wang, Yuanqing
    Zhao, Bo
    Ding, Dayi
    Jiang, Yang
    Shi, Yongjiu
    Chen, Zhihua
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45 (SUPPL.2): : 72 - 75
  • [47] Seismic design for steel trussed arch to multi-support excitations
    Su, Liang
    Dong, Shilin
    Kato, Shiro
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2007, 63 (06) : 725 - 734
  • [48] Multi-support seismic input generation: an harmonization with code prescriptions
    Martinelli, Luca
    Barbella, Gianluca
    Feriani, Anna
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, EURODYN 2011, 2011, : 2743 - 2750
  • [49] Seismic response analysis of complicated connecting tall structures under multi-support earthquake excitations
    Gui, Guo-Qing
    Li, Yong-Hua
    Li, Si-Ming
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26 (10): : 95 - 101
  • [50] Hanger replacement influence on seismic response of suspension bridges: Implementation to the Bosphorus Bridge subjected to multi-support excitation
    Bas, Selcuk
    Dong, Chuan-Zhi
    Apaydin, Nurdan M.
    Ilki, Alper
    Catbas, F. Necati
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2020, 49 (14): : 1496 - 1518