Assessment of growth suppression in apple production with replant soils

被引:0
|
作者
Cavael U. [1 ]
Diehl K. [1 ,2 ]
Lentzsch P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Centre of Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, Müncheberg
[2] University of Potsdam, Institute of Environmental Sciences and Geography, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Potsdam
来源
Diehl, Katharina (kdiehl@uni-potsdam.de) | 1600年 / Elsevier B.V., Netherlands卷 / 109期
关键词
Alternaria group; Apple production; Apple replant disease; Orchard management; Soil fatigue; Trunk cross-sectional area;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105846
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Apple replant disease (ARD) is a specific apple-related form of soil fertility loss due to unidentified causes and is also known as soil fatigue. The effect typically appears in monoculture production sites and leads to production decreases of up to 50%, even though the cultivation practice remains the same. However, an indication of replant disease is challenged by the lack of specification of the particular microbial group responsible for ARD. The objective of this study was to establish an algorithm for estimating growth suppression in orchards irrespective of the unknowns in the complex causal relationship by assessing plant-soil interaction in the orchard several years after planting. Based on a comparison between no-replant and replant soils, the Alternaria group (Ag) was identified as a soil-fungal population responding to replant with abundance. The trunk cross-sectional area (CSA) was found to be a practical and robust parameter representing below-ground and above-ground tree performance. Suppression of tree vigour was therefore calculated by dividing the two inversely related parameters, Q = ln(Ag)/CSA, as a function of soil-fungal proportions and plant responses at the single-tree level. On this basis, five clusters of tree vigour suppression (Q) were defined: (1) no tree vigour suppression/vital (0%), (2) escalating (−38%), (3) strong (−53%), (4) very strong (−62%), and (5) critical (−74%). By calculating Q at the level of the single tree, trees were clustered according to tree vigour suppression. The weighted frequency of clusters in the field allowed replant impact to be quantified at field level. Applied to a case study on sandy brown, dry diluvial soils in Brandenburg, Germany, the calculated tree vigour suppression was −46% compared to the potential tree vigour on no-replant soil in the same field. It is highly likely that the calculated growth suppression corresponds to ARD-impact. This result is relevant for identifying functional changes in soil and for monitoring the economic effects of soil fatigue in apple orchards, particularly where long-period crop rotation or plot exchange are improbable. © 2019 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Apple rootstock evaluation for apple replant disease
    Kviklys, D.
    Robinson, T. L.
    Fazio, G.
    XXIX INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS ON HORTICULTURE: SUSTAINING LIVES, LIVELIHOODS AND LANDSCAPES: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIA ON THE PHYSIOLOGY OF PERENNIAL FRUIT CROPS AND PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND MECHANISATION, PRECISION HORTICULTURE AND ROBOTICS, 2016, 1130 : 425 - 430
  • [22] Characterization of the rhizosphere and endophytic microbiome across apple rootstock genotypes in replant orchard soils
    Van Horn, C.
    Somera, T.
    Mazzola, M.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 110 (12) : 82 - 82
  • [23] ETIOLOGY OF AN APPLE REPLANT DISEASE
    JAFFEE, BA
    ABAWI, GS
    MAI, WF
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1981, 71 (02) : 228 - 228
  • [24] Peach seedling growth in replant and non-replant soils after inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
    Rutto, Kipkoriony L.
    Mizutani, Fusao
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 38 (09): : 2536 - 2542
  • [25] INVESTIGATIONS ABOUT THE COURSE OF INFESTATION OF ROOTLETS OF APPLE SEEDLINGS BY ROOT PATHOGENIC ACTINOMYCETES IN SOILS WITH SPECIFIC APPLE REPLANT DISEASE
    OTTO, G
    WINKLER, H
    SZABO, K
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR MIKROBIOLOGIE, 1993, 148 (07): : 467 - 476
  • [26] Growth Responses of Young Apple Plants Induced by Soil Remediation Treatments for Specific Apple Replant Disease
    Tustin, D. S.
    Horner, I.
    Breen, K.
    Dayatilake, D.
    Bigwood, E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENHANCING ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY OF FRUIT PRODUCTION IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY, 2008, (772): : 407 - 411
  • [27] APPLE REPLANT PROBLEM IN WASHINGTON STATE
    BENSON, NR
    COVEY, RP
    HAGLUND, W
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1978, 103 (02) : 156 - 158
  • [28] Rootstock resistance to apple replant disease
    Kviklys, D.
    Abukauskas, V.
    Lanauskas, J.
    Uselis, N.
    XXXI INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, IHC2022: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADAPTATION OF HORTICULTURAL PLANTS TO ABIOTIC STRESSES, 2023, 1372 : 295 - 300
  • [29] Comparative Analysis of the Rhizosphere and Endophytic Microbiomes across Apple Rootstock Genotypes in Replant Orchard Soils
    Van Horn, Christopher
    Somera, Tracey S.
    Mazzola, Mark
    PHYTOBIOMES JOURNAL, 2021, 5 (02): : 231 - 243
  • [30] ASSOCIATION OF AN ACTINOMYCETE WITH APPLE REPLANT DISEASE
    WESTCOTT, SW
    BEER, SV
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1983, 73 (09) : 1348 - 1348