APD: An automated parameter determination system based on in-situ tests

被引:0
|
作者
Marzouk, Islam [1 ]
Brinkgreve, Ronald [2 ]
Lengkeek, Arny [3 ]
Tschuchnigg, Franz [1 ]
机构
[1] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Soil Mech Fdn Engn & Computat Geotech, Graz, Austria
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Witteveen Bos, Deventer, Netherlands
关键词
CPT; DMT; FEM; In-situ testing; Graph theory; Soil parameters; SHEAR-WAVE VELOCITY; ENGINEERING PROPERTIES; CLAYS; PIEZOCONE; SOILS; BEHAVIOR; STRESS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106799
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In-situ testing has numerous applications in geotechnical engineering. The interpretation of in-situ test results includes soil stratification and determination of soil parameters. This paper presents an automated parameter determination framework that aims to determine constitutive model parameters based on in-situ tests. The ongoing research project relies on a graph-based approach for determining the parameters. The framework has two main attributes: transparency and adaptability. Transparency is achieved by illustrating how a certain parameter was computed. Adaptability is ensured by allowing users to incorporate their expertise into the framework. The system currently determines parameters based on three main workflows that utilize the results of cone penetration tests, dilatometer tests, and shear wave velocity measurements. This study employs the three main workflows to determine soil parameters for one of the Norwegian GeoTest Sites. Additionally, the connection between the parameter determination system and finite element analysis is discussed, where the parameters for the Modified Cam Clay model are evaluated. The framework is valuable in the early stages of projects, providing detailed soil information when soil data is limited. Ongoing research aims to assess the accuracy of the derived soil and constitutive model parameters and to expand the system's capabilities by including additional in-situ tests.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Process and Evaluation of Automated Robotic Fabrication System for In-Situ Structure Confinement
    Kumar, B. Bala Murali
    Hsueh, Yun Chung
    Xin, Zhuoyang
    Luo, Dan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 DIGITALFUTURES, CDRF 2021, 2022, : 368 - 379
  • [22] Core-based determination of in-situ stress magnitudes
    Pestman, BJ
    Kenter, CJ
    van Munster, HG
    ROCK MECHANICS IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 1353 - 1360
  • [23] A system of neural networks for deriving soil parameters from in-situ tests
    Juang, CH
    Ni, SH
    Lu, PC
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN PAVEMENT AND GEOMECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 1998, : 65 - 72
  • [24] Automated in-situ water quality monitoring
    Nishioka, K.
    Brooks, R.
    InTech, 1979, 26 (10): : 47 - 51
  • [26] Automated Parameter Derivation for Power Plant Models Based on Staged Tests
    Pourbeik, P.
    2009 IEEE/PES POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 178 - 186
  • [27] Automated Determination of the Input Parameter of DBSCAN Based on Outlier Detection
    Akbari, Zohreh
    Unland, Rainer
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS, AIAI 2016, 2016, 475 : 280 - 291
  • [28] In-situ tests on liquefaction potential of subsoils
    Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 2008, 1 : 449 - 469
  • [29] Ground property characterization by in-situ tests
    Mayne, PW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 4, 2002, : 2703 - 2704
  • [30] Cementation effect on various in-situ tests
    Lee, M. J.
    Choi, Y. M.
    Chae, Y. H.
    Lee, W.
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION 4, VOLS I AND II, 2013, : 1693 - 1700