Comparison and appraisal of four different methods for CO2 enrichment

被引:0
|
作者
Wei, M. [1 ]
Wang, X. [1 ]
Xing, Y. [1 ]
Zhang, Y. [1 ]
Wang, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Horticultural Coll. of Shandong, Tai'an 271018, China
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Three methods for CO2 enrichment-chemical reaction (H2SO4 + NH4HCO3), briquet combustion, granular CO2 fertilizer were comparatively studied in free tunnels and solar greenhouses for cucumber cultivation, and the yearly total cost of different methods (including pure liquid CO2) were compared. Chemical reaction had higher CO2 releasing velocity and relatively lower equipment depreciation charge; honeycomb briquet combustion produced CO2 at moderate rate, and the raw material cost was the least; granular CO2 fertilizer having highest raw material cost released CO2 slowest. When the re-use of by-product of chemical reaction was concerned, annual cost of chemical reaction was similar with that of briquet combustion and liquid CO2. Comprehensively evaluated from viewpoints of ecology, energy-saving, cost and effect, briquet combustion was in more accordance with the present situations in China including facility type, economic situation, resource condition and technique level, and so on.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of different methods for determining key parameters affecting CO2 storage capacity in oil reservoirs
    Liao, Changlin
    Liao, Xinwei
    Zhao, Xiaoliang
    Ding, Hongna
    Liu, Xiaopeng
    Liu, Yongge
    Chen, Jing
    Lu, Ning
    International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 28 : 25 - 34
  • [32] A comparison of four different block bootstrap methods
    Radovanov, Boris
    Marcikic, Aleksandra
    CROATIAN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2014, 5 (02) : 189 - 202
  • [33] Comparison of four different phenylalanine determination methods
    Fingerhut, R
    Stehn, M
    Kohlschutter, A
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1997, 264 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [34] Geophysical methods for CO2 plume imaging: comparison of performances
    Fabriol, H.
    Bitri, A.
    Bourgeois, B.
    Delatre, M.
    Girard, J. F.
    Pajot, G.
    Rohmer, J.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 3604 - 3611
  • [36] A comparison of two methods for producing CO2 capture adsorbents
    Plaza, M. G.
    Pevida, C.
    Arias, B.
    Fermoso, J.
    Rubiera, F.
    Pis, J. J.
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 1107 - 1113
  • [37] Crop water relations under different CO2 and irrigation:: testing of ecosys with the free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment
    Grant, RF
    Wall, GW
    Kimball, BA
    Frumau, KFA
    Pinter, PJ
    Hunsaker, DJ
    Lamorte, RL
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1999, 95 (01) : 27 - 51
  • [38] Effects of different CO2 enrichment programs during the day on production of cut roses
    Pan, H.
    Zhang, Q.
    Liang, S.
    Liu, Q.
    Kang, H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ORNAMENTALS, NOW!, 2008, (766): : 59 - +
  • [39] PREDICTING YIELD RESPONSES TO DIFFERENT GREENHOUSE CO2 ENRICHMENT SCHEMES - CUCUMBERS AND TOMATOES
    WILLITS, DH
    PEET, MM
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1989, 44 (3-4) : 275 - 293
  • [40] CO2 enrichment in a fan-ventilated greenhouse under different ventilation modes
    Amir, R
    Teitel, M
    Shemer, L
    Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Greenhouse Systems, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, (691): : 619 - 624