The ambiguous prospects for EU climate policy - A summary of options

被引:0
|
作者
Wettestad, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fridtjof Nansen Institute, PO Box 326, Lysaker 1326, Norway
来源
Energy and Environment | 2001年 / 12卷 / 2-3期
关键词
Greenhouse effect - Public policy;
D O I
10.1260/0958305011500670
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The European Union is a key actor in international efforts to build an effective response to the challenge of global elimate change. After the US, it is the second biggest emitter of greenhouse gases. In the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the EU committed itself to an 8% reduction of a basket of greenhouse gases. However, EU climate policy so far must be characterised as more of a failure than a success. Not least worrisome, EU officials have recently projected that EU greenhouse gas emissions will increase 6-8% by the end of this decade. In light of the Kyoto commitments and EU climate policy ambitions, what is most probable -comforting emission cuts or embarrassing increases? What are the main, determining factors? On the basis of a summary and review of important developments and achievements in EU climate policy, including the more recent, post-Kyoto developments, the central discussion of key future perspectives are carried out; distinguishing between national, EU-level and global lenses. Domestic progress so far makes it tempting to adopt a pessimistic position. But complexity is very high and simple and sweeping assessments and answers should be treated with every bit of caution and suspicion.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 165
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Confronting the Climate Challenge: US Policy Options
    Jaccard, Mark
    ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2018, 7 (02) : 148 - 150
  • [32] Climate policy options: A comparison of economic performance
    Chateau, Jean
    Jaumotte, Florence
    Schwerhoff, Gregor
    ENERGY POLICY, 2024, 192
  • [33] Global climate change: impacts and policy options
    Jain, Ravi
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2008, 10 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [34] Climate policy options and the transformation of the energy system
    Held, H.
    NEW STRATEGIES FOR ENERGY GENERATION, CONVERSION AND STORAGE, 2013, 54
  • [35] EU policy options for regulating carbon capture and storage
    Williamson, David J.
    Zakkour, Paul
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2008, 60 (07): : 87 - 88
  • [36] Climate Policy Options and the World Trade Organization
    Hufbauer, Gary Clyde
    Kim, Jisun
    ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2009, 3
  • [37] Agricultural policy options for Slovenia in the prospect of EU accession
    Erjavec, E
    Kavcic, S
    Mergos, G
    Stoforos, C
    EASTERN EUROPEAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 39 (01) : 39 - 60
  • [38] Population Ethics and the Prospects for Fertility Policy as Climate Mitigation Policy
    Budolfson, Mark
    Spears, Dean
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2021, 57 (09): : 1499 - 1510
  • [39] Exploring policy options for a new rural America - A conference summary
    Drabenstott, M
    Sheaff, KH
    EXPLORING POLICY OPTIONS FOR A NEW RURAL AMERICA, 2001, : 1 - 7
  • [40] US climate policy: Evolution and future prospects
    Agrawala, S.
    Andresen, S.
    Energy and Environment, 2001, 12 (2-3): : 117 - 137