Unified Motion Planning Method for Heterogeneous Vehicles

被引:0
|
作者
Guan, Haijie [1 ]
Wang, Boyang [1 ]
Gong, Jianwei [1 ]
Chen, Huiyan [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing,100081, China
关键词
D O I
10.3901/JME.2024.18.288
中图分类号
U2 [铁路运输]; U4 [公路运输];
学科分类号
摘要
Under the unified algorithm framework, by incorporating the unique motion characteristics of heterogeneous vehicles to generate differentiated planning results, a motion planning method based on generating and selecting behavior primitives is proposed. First, a primitive optimization generation problem that integrates driving behavior data and vehicle kinematics model is constructed. By establishing driving behavior constraints with spatio-temporal coupling information, based on the primitive category and its own longitudinal and lateral coupling laws, the optimal generation of the behavior primitive library is completed. Secondly, under the unified behavior primitive extension and selection framework, the primitives are selected from the behavior primitive library, associating as the behavior primitive sequence, generating the motion planning results coupled with trajectory and velocity. Finally, in the unstructured scene, the actual experimental research of the wheeled and tracked vehicle platforms is carried out. The results show that the proposed unified motion planning method for heterogeneous vehicles can generate motion planning results, reflecting the differences in the characteristics of heterogeneous vehicles, benefiting from the diversity of primitives in the behavioral primitive library and the richness of the information covered. © 2024 Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 298
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feedback Enhanced Motion Planning for Autonomous Vehicles
    Sun, Ke
    Schlotfeldt, Brent
    Chaves, Stephen
    Martin, Paul
    Mandhyan, Gulshan
    Kumar, Vijay
    2020 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2020, : 2126 - 2133
  • [22] Motion planning of legged vehicles in an unstructured environment
    Eldershaw, C
    Yim, M
    2001 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS I-IV, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 3383 - 3389
  • [23] A Review of Motion Planning Techniques for Automated Vehicles
    Gonzalez, David
    Perez, Joshue
    Milanes, Vicente
    Nashashibi, Fawzi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 17 (04) : 1135 - 1145
  • [24] A REVIEW OF OPTIMAL MOTION PLANNING FOR UNMANNED VEHICLES
    Gao, Shuhua
    Huang, Sunan
    Xiang, Cheng
    Lee, Tong Heng
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TAIWAN, 2020, 28 (05): : 321 - 330
  • [25] A Review on Cooperative Motion Planning of Unmanned Vehicles
    Kong G.
    Feng S.
    Yu H.
    Ju Z.
    Gong J.
    Binggong Xuebao/Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44 (01): : 11 - 26
  • [26] Integrated Motion Planning and Coordination for Industrial Vehicles
    Cirillo, Marcello
    Pecora, Federico
    Andreasson, Henrik
    Uras, Tansel
    Koenig, Sven
    TWENTY-FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED PLANNING AND SCHEDULING, 2014, : 463 - 471
  • [27] Crash Mitigation in Motion Planning for Autonomous Vehicles
    Wang, Hong
    Huang, Yanjun
    Khajepour, Amir
    Rasekhipour, Yadollah
    Zhang, Yubiao
    Cao, Dongpu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 20 (09) : 3313 - 3323
  • [28] Development of sensor-based motion planning method for an autonomous navigation of robotic vehicles
    Kim D.-H.
    Kim C.-J.
    Lee J.-Y.
    Han C.-S.
    Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems, 2011, 17 (06) : 513 - 520
  • [29] Motion Planning of a UAV Using a Kinodynamic Motion Planning Method
    Motonaka, Kimiko
    Watanabe, Keigo
    Maeyama, Shoichi
    39TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY (IECON 2013), 2013, : 6383 - 6387
  • [30] A joint production and transportation planning problem with heterogeneous vehicles
    Toptal, A.
    Koc, U.
    Sabuncuoglu, I.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (02) : 180 - 196