Seismic behavior of SCFT column-H section steel beam plane frame

被引:0
|
作者
Tianjin University Research Institute of Architectural Design & Urban Planning, Tianjin [1 ]
300073, China
不详 [2 ]
300072, China
不详 [3 ]
300072, China
机构
关键词
Cyclic loads - Axial compression - Earthquakes - Hysteresis - Bearing capacity - Stiffness - Walls (structural partitions) - Steel beams and girders - Tubular steel structures;
D O I
10.11784/tdxbz201505002
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, SCFT column-H section steel beam plane frame is analyzed through establishing nonlinear finite element models by ANSYS. Seven sets of models were built under low cyclic loading conditions. The mechanical characteristics of these frame models were simulated. The axial compression ratio was set to be the control variable, and the influence of infilled wall on the frame was studied as well. The result shows that all the seven sets of models present symmetrical and smooth plumped hysteretic curves under low cyclic loadings, and the decending segment of the skeleton curve is slightly inclined;after mono-steel tube column reaches its yield strength in the compression section, the entire SCFT can still take more load as an integrated member, and therefore it delays the plastic deformation of the frame, showing its preferred earthquake resistant capacity;no promising evidence shows that the axial compression ratio has a strong influence on the frame's stiffness degradation, however, as the ratio increases, the ultimate bearing-capacity and displacement ductility both decrease, and the strength decreases obviously after it has reached ultimate bearing-capacity;the infilled wall bears a considerable amount of lateral load at the early stage of loading, increasing the bearing-capacity and elastic stiffness of the plane frame obviously. Considering that the rigid connection to infilled wall results in early crash of the wall, it is suggested that flexible connections or extension joints between the frame and infilled wall should be adopted in practical constructions to reduce the damage. ©, 2015, Tianjin University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental study on the seismic performance of a cold-formed thin-walled steel–concrete composite column-H steel beam frame
    HongJie Hou
    ZhiHua Chen
    XiuLi Wang
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] Experimental study on the seismic performance of a cold-formed thin-walled steel-concrete composite column-H steel beam frame
    Hou, HongJie
    Chen, ZhiHua
    Wang, XiuLi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [3] Seismic Behavior of PC Column and Steel Beam Composite Moment Frame with Posttensioned Connection
    Wu, Yuntian
    Xiao, Yan
    Anderson, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (11) : 1398 - 1407
  • [4] Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete column-steel beam subassemblies and frame systems
    Liang, XM
    Parra-Montesinos, GJ
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (02) : 310 - 319
  • [5] Research on seismic behavior of special-shaped CFST column to H-section steel beam joint
    Cheng, Yu
    Yang, Yuanlong
    Li, Binyang
    Liu, Jiepeng
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (13) : 2870 - 2884
  • [6] Experimental study on seismic behavior of space steel frame with reduced beam section connections
    Wang Y.
    Li Q.
    Dong J.
    Zhuang P.
    1600, Science Press (37): : 192 - 200
  • [8] Seismic behavior and initial rotational stiffness of beam-to-column composite connection in steel frame
    Ma, Kang
    Ye, Xihao
    Wu, Ruoyang
    Yu, Haifeng
    Wang, Zhuo
    Jin, Tianjiao
    Ji, Wenjun
    Zhao, Yang
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 62
  • [9] SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF STEEL FRAME BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS UNDER ACIDIC ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
    Cao, Chen
    Zheng, ShanSuo
    Hu, WeiBing
    Zhang, XiaoHui
    Liu, Yi
    INGEGNERIA SISMICA, 2019, 36 (04): : 121 - 138
  • [10] Research on seismic behavior of cruciform special-shaped CFST column to H-section steel beam joint
    He Z.
    Hu S.
    Li B.
    Yang Y.
    Cheng Y.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43 (11): : 95 - 106