Cool species in tedious landscapes: Ecosystem services and disservices affect nature-based recreation in cultural landscapes

被引:0
|
作者
Brambilla M. [1 ,2 ]
Ronchi S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Fondazione Lombardia per l'Ambiente, Settore Biodiversità e Aree protette, Largo 10 luglio 1976 1, Seveso, I-20822, MB
[2] Museo delle Scienze, Sezione Zoologia dei Vertebrati, Corso della Scienza e del Lavoro 3, Trento
[3] Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, via Bonardi 3, Milano
关键词
Biodiversity conservation; Birding; Birds; Cultural Ecosystem Services; Farming; Vineyards;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106485
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) are the non-material benefits that people get from ecosystems; they have been less frequently investigated and incorporated into the decision-making processes in comparison to other ES. Ecosystems may also provide Cultural Ecosystem Disservices (CED), because of the bad feelings or perceptions they trigger. Nature-based recreation is an example of CES strictly linked to biodiversity. This paper is focused on cultural landscapes, which are particularly important for nature-based recreation and CES in general. We evaluated the potential CES and CED provided by bird species, and the habitats they occur in, to birdwatchers in Oltrepò pavese (Lombardy, Italy). We found that the number of observations by birdwatchers at the municipality level was positively affected by the number of target species for birders, as well as by a very negative effect of vineyard proportional cover. The number of target species per municipality was positively affected by shrubland and, marginally, vineyard cover, and negatively by urbanized areas. While the strong positive link between avian values and birdwatching rate (and hence, the CES provided by birds) was expected (confirming the potential use of selected bird species as indicators for CES), the strong negative impact (with associated CED) of vineyards was less obvious. Evidence pointed out that vineyard-dominated landscapes were perceived by birders as poorly suitable for birding. The potential reasons of such a negative perception could be the detrimental effect of extremely high vineyard cover on several species, and/or the decline of some conservation-priority species in the area partly caused by the conversion of semi-natural habitats into vineyards. The mild climate suitable for wine growing is favoured by the rarest species, and the occurrence of suitable marginal features (grassland, shrubland, hedgerows, etc.) is higher in the vineyard belt than in many other areas within the region, enhancing its suitability for several species. Vineyards are key components of cultural landscapes and are associated with high avian values in the area, but their occurrence discourages nature-based recreation resulting in a CED. Implementing biodiversity-friendly management practices and restoring key marginal features could both increase the environmental value of vineyards and improve the perception of vineyard value in nature-based recreationists, potentially triggering the transition from a cultural disservice into a cultural ecosystem service. A positive circularity could be expected, with the higher attractiveness granted by biodiversity-friendly practices stimulating more farmers to adopt them, with positive outcomes for nature conservation. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Crowdsourcing indicators for cultural ecosystem services: A geographically weighted approach for mountain landscapes
    Tenerelli, Patrizia
    Demsar, Urska
    Luque, Sandra
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 64 : 237 - 248
  • [42] Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services
    Potschin, Marion
    Haines-Young, Roy
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2013, 28 (06) : 1053 - 1065
  • [43] Designing agricultural landscapes for biodiversity-based ecosystem services
    Landis, Douglas A.
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 18 : 1 - 12
  • [44] Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services
    Marion Potschin
    Roy Haines-Young
    Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28 : 1053 - 1065
  • [45] Aligning nature-based solutions with ecosystem services in the urban century
    Remme, Roy P.
    Meacham, Megan
    Pellowe, Kara E.
    Andersson, Erik
    Guerry, Anne D.
    Janke, Benjamin
    Liu, Lingling
    Lonsdorf, Eric
    Li, Meng
    Mao, Yuanyuan
    Nootenboom, Christopher
    Wu, Tong
    van Oudenhoven, Alexander P. E.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 66
  • [46] Planning and governing nature-based solutions in river landscapes: Concepts, cases, and insights
    Christian Albert
    Jochen Hack
    Stefan Schmidt
    Barbara Schröter
    Ambio, 2021, 50 : 1405 - 1413
  • [47] Evaluation of nature-based climate solutions for agricultural landscapes in the Galápagos Islands
    Alomía Herrera, Ilia
    Molina, Armando
    Montes, Yessenia
    Dixon, Jean Louise
    Vanacker, Veerle
    Global and Planetary Change, 2024, 243
  • [48] Planning and governing nature-based solutions in river landscapes: Concepts, cases, and insights
    Albert, Christian
    Hack, Jochen
    Schmidt, Stefan
    Schroter, Barbara
    AMBIO, 2021, 50 (08) : 1405 - 1413
  • [49] Implementing Nature-Based Solutions in Rural Landscapes: Barriers Experienced in the PHUSICOS Project
    Solheim, Anders
    Capobianco, Vittoria
    Oen, Amy
    Kalsnes, Bjorn
    Wullf-Knutsen, Turid
    Olsen, Mari
    Del Seppia, Nicola
    Arauzo, Idoia
    Garcia Balaguer, Eva
    Strout, James Michael
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 22
  • [50] Limitations of Protected Areas Zoning in Mediterranean Cultural Landscapes Under the Ecosystem Services Approach
    Ignacio Palomo
    Berta Martín-López
    Paloma Alcorlo
    Carlos Montes
    Ecosystems, 2014, 17 : 1202 - 1215