Application of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment in the automotive sector – A systematic literature review

被引:0
|
作者
Ostojic, Suzana [1 ]
Traverso, Marzia [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Mies-van-der-Rohe-Str. 1, Aachen,52074, Germany
来源
关键词
Automotive industry - Costs - Decision making - Economic and social effects - Sustainable development;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the rapidly evolving automotive industry, there is an increasing need for comprehensive sustainability assessments to steer decision-making towards more sustainable practices. Our research tackles critical gaps in applying Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) to products and processes within this sector. Through a systematic literature review, we analysed 18 existing scholarly automotive-related LCSA case studies to pinpoint the current state of LCSA implementation, identify challenges, propose novel methodological insights and future directions. Despite the reinforced methodological framework of LCSA and the automotive industry's extensive experience in applying Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) over the past two decades, our in-depth analysis revealed significant discrepancies among automotive-related LCSA case studies, underscoring the lack of a harmonized methodological approach. Challenges include inconsistencies with established norms and guidelines regarding the choice of functional units (FUs), system boundaries, indicator selection across the sustainability pillars, and interpretation of results. Additionally, inadequate databases for the economic and social pillars hinder data availability and consistency. Selective aggregation of results and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods further contribute to divergences in findings. To address these challenges and advance LCSA in the automotive industry, methodological harmonization is crucial, including predefined FUs for consistent product systems, the systematic selection of system boundaries and indicators, the development of secondary databases for economic and social pillars, and the integration of visualization tools as well as standardized MCDA methods to evaluate trade-offs. Continued research efforts, collaboration, and methodological refinement are necessary to effectively harness the potential of LCSA for promoting sustainability in the automotive sector. © 2024 The Authors
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 127
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Valdivia, Sonia
    Backes, Jana Gerta
    Traverso, Marzia
    Sonnemann, Guido
    Cucurachi, Stefano
    Guinee, Jeroen B.
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Leroy-Parmentier, Noemie
    Ugaya, Cassia
    Pena, Claudia
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    Inaba, Atsushi
    Amaral, Milena
    Berger, Markus
    Dvarioniene, Jolanta
    Vakhitova, Tatiana
    Benoit-Norris, Catherine
    Prox, Martina
    Foolmaun, Rajendra
    Goedkoop, Mark
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (09): : 1900 - 1905
  • [32] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Sonia Valdivia
    Jana Gerta Backes
    Marzia Traverso
    Guido Sonnemann
    Stefano Cucurachi
    Jeroen B. Guinée
    Thomas Schaubroeck
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Noemie Leroy-Parmentier
    Cássia Ugaya
    Claudia Peña
    Alessandra Zamagni
    Atsushi Inaba
    Milena Amaral
    Markus Berger
    Jolanta Dvarioniene
    Tatiana Vakhitova
    Catherine Benoit-Norris
    Martina Prox
    Rajendra Foolmaun
    Mark Goedkoop
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1900 - 1905
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of electricity from biogas: A systematic literature review
    Salvador, Rodrigo
    Barros, Murillo Vetroni
    De Paula Do Rosario, Jose Guilherme
    Piekarski, Cassiano Moro
    da Luz, Leila Mendes
    de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 38 (04)
  • [34] Life cycle assessment in the building design process - A systematic literature review
    Roberts, Matthew
    Allen, Stephen
    Coley, David
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 185
  • [35] Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review
    Mesa, Jaime A.
    Fuquene-Retamoso, Carlos
    Maury-Ramirez, Anibal
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [36] A Systematic Review of Urban Sustainability Assessment Literature
    Cohen, Matthew
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (11)
  • [37] Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review
    Buyle, Matthias
    Braet, Johan
    Audenaert, Amaryllis
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 26 : 379 - 388
  • [38] Systematic literature review of life cycle sustainability assessment system for residential buildings: using bibliometric analysis 2000–2020
    Parul Bhyan
    Bhavna Shrivastava
    Nand Kumar
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 13637 - 13665
  • [39] Advances in application of machine learning to life cycle assessment: a literature review
    Ghoroghi, Ali
    Rezgui, Yacine
    Petri, Ioan
    Beach, Thomas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (03): : 433 - 456
  • [40] Advances in application of machine learning to life cycle assessment: a literature review
    Ali Ghoroghi
    Yacine Rezgui
    Ioan Petri
    Thomas Beach
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 433 - 456