A Comparative Analysis of Digital Forensic Investigation Tools on Facebook Messenger Applications

被引:0
|
作者
Sunardi [1 ]
Herman [2 ]
Ardiningtias S.R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Electrical Engineering, Ahmad Dahlan University, Yogyakarta
[2] Ahmad Dahlan University, Yogyakarta
来源
关键词
Facebook Messenger; fraud; media social; National Institute of Justice;
D O I
10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.1151
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Technological developments make it easier for people to communicate and share information. Facebook Messenger is an instant messenger that contains multi-platform for sending text, image, sound, and video messages. Besides being used for positive purposes, this technology can also be used to carry out harmful activities. This study conducts a forensic investigation on a crime simulation in pornographic content distribution using Facebook Messenger as a communication medium on Android smartphones. Perpetrators communicate and send pornographic content in the shape of conversations, audio, and video, then delete them to eliminate traces. Every crime can leave evidence therefore after erasing the track, it can be revealed through digital forensic investigations on the smartphone devices that are used as objects to find digital evidence. The collection of evidence in this study is used four forensic tools with the research stages the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) framework. The study result can be used as evidence by investigators on handling criminal cases with the results obtained in the shape of application versions, accounts, emails, conversation, time of occurrence, pictures, audio, and video. MOBILedit Forensic Express has an accuracy of 84.85%, Wondershare Dr. Fone 36.36%, Magnet Axiom 75.76%, and Belkasoft Evidence Center 69.70%. © 2022 River Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 672
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparative analysis of digital forensic readiness models using CFRaaS as a baseline
    Kebande, Victor Rigworo
    Venter, Hein S.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS: FORENSIC SCIENCE, 2019, 1 (06):
  • [32] Digital forensic investigation in the age of ChatGPT
    Scanlon, Mark
    Nikkel, Bruce
    Geradts, Zeno
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-DIGITAL INVESTIGATION, 2023, 44
  • [33] Unboxing the digital forensic investigation process
    Horsman, Graeme
    Sunde, Nina
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2022, 62 (02) : 171 - 180
  • [34] Review of Digital Forensic Investigation frameworks
    Agarwal, Ritu
    Kothari, Suvarna
    Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2015, 339 : 561 - 571
  • [35] Digital forensic investigation framework for the metaverse
    Seunghee Seo
    Byoungjin Seok
    Changhoon Lee
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2023, 79 : 9467 - 9485
  • [36] Digital forensic investigation framework for the metaverse
    Seo, Seunghee
    Seok, Byoungjin
    Lee, Changhoon
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2023, 79 (09): : 9467 - 9485
  • [37] Digital Forensics Analysis of Windows 11 Shellbag with Comparative Tools
    Neyaz, Ashar
    Shashidhar, Narasimha
    Varol, Cihan
    Rasheed, Amar
    2022 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DIGITAL FORENSICS AND SECURITY (ISDFS), 2022,
  • [38] Applications of a digital darkroom in the forensic laboratory
    Bullard, B
    Birge, B
    FORENSIC EVIDENCE ANALYSIS AND CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION, 1997, 2941 : 75 - 82
  • [39] Facebook groups as social intervention tools for improving digital skills
    Castillo de Mesa, Joaquin
    Gomez Jacinto, Luis
    SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2020, 39 (01) : 71 - 84
  • [40] Video-Based Evidence Analysis and Extraction in Digital Forensic Investigation
    Xiao, Jianyu
    Li, Shancang
    Xu, Qingliang
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 55432 - 55442