Error correction method based on deep learning for improving the accuracy of conceptual rainfall-runoff model

被引:2
|
作者
Wenchuan, Wang [1 ]
Yanwei, Zhao [1 ]
Dongmei, Xu [1 ]
Yanghao, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Coll Water Resources, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China
关键词
Distributed hydrological model; Flood forecasting; Error correction; Deep learning; LSTM; Transformer; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; XINANJIANG; COMBINATION; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131992
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Due to the complex runoff and concentration situation, flood forecasting for small and medium-sized catchments is very difficult. To improve the accuracy of flood forecasting, this study constructs a distributed model for flood forecasting based on the Xainanjiang (XAJ) model and the North China (NC) model respectively, and takes the deep learning model including LSTM and transformer to compare. Taking the Podi Basin and Shibazi Basin as study cases. LSTM, Transformer, and LSTPencoder models were used to correct the error of distributed models, and the differential evolution (DE) algorithm was used to optimize the model parameters. Taking the observed rainfall and distributed model results as input, the residuals of the simulation flow are fitted to improve the accuracy of the distributed model. The research results show that the NC model performs better than the XAJ, LSTM, and transformer models. Compared with the XAJ model, the average Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of the NC model for the two catchments increased by 25.7 % and 5.87 % respectively. The performance of the NC+LSTPencoder model is better than other models. Compared with the NC model, the average Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of the NC+LSTPencoder model for two catchments increased by 89.7 % and 1.12 % respectively, and the Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) of the two catchments reduced by 79.1 % and 63.4 % respectively. The model proposed in this paper has strong correction ability, which has important significance for improving the accuracy of flood forecasts.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deep Learning with Long Short Term Memory Based Sequence-to-Sequence Model for Rainfall-Runoff Simulation
    Han, Heechan
    Choi, Changhyun
    Jung, Jaewon
    Kim, Hung Soo
    WATER, 2021, 13 (04)
  • [42] Comparative analysis of data-driven and GIS-based conceptual rainfall-runoff model
    Jayawardena, AW
    Muttil, N
    Lee, JHW
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2006, 11 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [43] Deep learning for monthly rainfall-runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia
    Clark, Stephanie R.
    Lerat, Julien
    Perraud, Jean-Michel
    Fitch, Peter
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2024, 28 (05) : 1191 - 1213
  • [44] A rainfall-runoff model based on the Least Action Principle
    Afouda, A.
    Lawin, E. A.
    Lebel, T.
    Peugeot, C.
    Seguis, L.
    REGIONAL HYDROLOGICAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATIC CHANGE - HYDROCLIMATIC VARIABILITY, 2005, 296 : 129 - 137
  • [45] Enhancing rainfall-runoff model accuracy with machine learning models by using soil water index to reflect runoff characteristics
    Iamampai, Sarunphas
    Talaluxmana, Yutthana
    Kanasut, Jirawat
    Rangsiwanichpong, Prem
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 89 (02) : 368 - 381
  • [46] TreeLSTM: A spatiotemporal machine learning model for rainfall-runoff estimation
    Chen, Zeqiang
    Lin, Hui
    Shen, Gaoyun
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 48
  • [47] Combining rainfall-runoff model outputs for improving ensemble streamflow prediction
    Kim, Young-Oh
    Jeong, Daell
    Ko, Ick Hwan
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2006, 11 (06) : 578 - 588
  • [48] UNIQUENESS AND OBSERVABILITY OF CONCEPTUAL RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL PARAMETERS - THE PERCOLATION PROCESS EXAMINED
    GUPTA, VK
    SOROOSHIAN, S
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1983, 19 (01) : 269 - 276
  • [49] Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff processes inside an artificial neural network
    Wilby, RL
    Abrahart, RJ
    Dawson, CW
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2003, 48 (02) : 163 - 181
  • [50] Sensitivity of the performance of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model to the temporal sampling of calibration data
    Bastola, Satish
    Murphy, Conor
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 44 (03): : 484 - 494