Simulation of Within-Field Yield Variability in a Four-Crop Rotation Field Using SSURGO Soil-Unit Definitions and the Epic Model

被引:0
|
作者
Perez-Quezada, J.F. [1 ]
Cavero, J. [2 ]
Williams, J. [3 ]
Roel, A. [1 ]
Plant, R.E. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, United States
[2] Dep. Genét. y Prod. Vegetal, Estacion Experimental de Aula Dei, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] TX Agricultural Experiment Station, Grass. Soil and Water Res. Lab., Temple, TX, United States
[4] Depts. Agronomy Range Sci. Biol. A., University of California, Davis, CA, United States
[5] Dept. of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States
关键词
Agriculture - Computer simulation - Soils - Textures;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Soil data were collected from a 30 ha commercial field using a 60 m sampling grid. Monitored yield data were also collected in this field between 1996 and 1999, when it had a wheat-processing tomato-bean-sunflower crop rotation. A comparison between SSURGO-NRCS soil-unit definition and field-measured soil data showed that in this field the former are a good approximation and starting point for precision agriculture studies and management. In a second test, the EPIC model, using the SSURGO database soil type definitions, was found to reproduce the yield variability within this field with reasonable accuracy. The model's performance was not as good when tested with data from soil samples, apparently due to the way EPIC simulates water holding capacity from texture information and the lack of some key variables (not sampled), such as water content at field-capacity (FC), wilting-point (WP), and soil saturated conductivity. A set of runs was performed to simulate the yield at 13 point-locations in the field using FC, WP, and bulk density. Although the accuracy of the simulation did not improve greatly, the model reproduced the yield trend of two of the crops (wheat and sunflower).
引用
收藏
页码:1365 / 1374
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Soil factors and their influence on within-field crop variability, part II: Spatial analysis and determination of management zones
    Taylor, JC
    Wood, GA
    Earl, R
    Godwin, RJ
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2003, 84 (04) : 441 - 453
  • [32] Prediction of within-field yield and protein variability in malting barley using canopy reflectance, thermal stress, and soil electrical conductivity
    Pettersson, CG
    Söderström, M
    Frankow-Lindberg, B
    Precision Agriculture 05, 2005, : 377 - 384
  • [33] Interpreting Within-Field Relationships between Crop Yields and Soil and Plant Variables Using Factor Analysis
    Mallarino A.P.
    Oyarzabal E.S.
    Hinz P.N.
    Precision Agriculture, 1999, 1 (1) : 15 - 25
  • [34] Monitoring Within-Field Variability of Corn Yield using Sentinel-2 and Machine Learning Techniques
    Kayad, Ahmed
    Sozzi, Marco
    Gatto, Simone
    Marinello, Francesco
    Pirotti, Francesco
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (23)
  • [35] Modelling within-field spatial variability of crop biomass - weed density relationships using geographically weighted regression
    Blanco-Moreno, J. M.
    Chamorro, L.
    Izquierdo, J.
    Masalles, R. M.
    Sans, F. X.
    WEED RESEARCH, 2008, 48 (06) : 512 - 522
  • [36] Simulation of within field variability of corn yield with Ceres-Maize model
    Corá, JE
    Pierce, FJ
    Basso, B
    Ritchie, JT
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, PTS A AND B, 1999, : 1309 - 1319
  • [37] Mapping within-field variability of soybean evapotranspiration and crop coefficient using the Earth Engine Evaporation Flux (EEFlux) application
    Venancio, Luan Peroni
    Eugenio, Fernando Coelho
    Filgueiras, Roberto
    da Cunha, Fernando Franca
    dos Santos, Robson Argolo
    Ribeiro, Wilian Rodrigues
    Mantovani, Everardo Chartuni
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [38] Studying the Feasibility of Assimilating Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope Imagery into the SAFY Crop Model to Predict Within-Field Wheat Yield
    Manivasagam, V. S.
    Sadeh, Yuval
    Kaplan, Gregoriy
    Bonfil, David J.
    Rozenstein, Offer
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [39] Multi-time scale analysis of sugarcane within-field variability:: improved crop diagnosis using satellite time series?
    Begue, Agnes
    Todoroff, Pierre
    Pater, Johanna
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2008, 9 (03) : 161 - 171
  • [40] Multi-time scale analysis of sugarcane within-field variability: improved crop diagnosis using satellite time series?
    Agnès Bégué
    Pierre Todoroff
    Johanna Pater
    Precision Agriculture, 2008, 9 : 161 - 171