A multi-objective optimization decision-making methodology for fostering synergies in the water-energy-food nexus

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Tong [1 ]
Tan, Qian [2 ]
Zhang, Tianyuan [2 ]
He, Linjun [3 ]
Yu, Xiaoning [4 ]
Zhang, Shan [5 ]
机构
[1] Yantai Univ, Sch Comp & Control Engn, Yantai 264005, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Technol, Guangdong Basic Res Ctr Excellence Ecol Secur & Gr, Sch Ecol Environm & Resources, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Water Qual Improvement & Ec, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Singapore 117575, Singapore
[4] Shandong Technol & Business Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Sch Artificial Intelligence, Yantai 264005, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Sch Hydraul Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water-energy-food nexus; Meta-heuristic algorithm; Multi-objective optimization; Decision-making; Optimal resource allocation; NONDOMINATED SORTING APPROACH; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; POWER-GENERATION; POINT; INVESTMENT; SYSTEMS; CHINA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144051
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Current decision-making methods within the water-energy-food nexus (WEFN) encounter challenges in practicality, portability, scalability, and accuracy. Optimization methods, integrating site-specific data, offer promise for achieving desired outcomes and enhancing practical decision implementation within WEFN systems. However, these methods still struggle with solving multi-objective and multi-constraint problems, poor performance, and decision-making difficulties. This study developed an optimization method for WEFN systems, which integrates an evolutionary algorithm, swarm intelligence algorithm, multistage evolutionary algorithm, and postoptimization theories to address these issues. Performance results demonstrated that the proposed algorithm outperformed traditional metaheuristic optimization algorithms. Specifically, it excelled in tackling highdimensional constrained problems, surpassing the classical NSGA series algorithms with a 1.34-fold improvement in the comprehensive performance metric HV. Subsequently, this algorithm combined with knee point postoptimization theory was applied to a typical arid region known for food and energy production. Compared with the business-as-usual scenario, the optimized schemes enhance agricultural benefits, saving 13.3 billion m3 of water over the entire planning period. Meanwhile, sustainable energy implementation would yield potential carbon emission reduction benefits of around 2.8 billion CNY. In summary, the proposed method would successfully provide a paradigm for the synergetic decision-making of WEFN systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decision-Making Theory and Methodology for Water, Energy and Food Security
    Xu, Yejun
    WATER, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [22] Study on the method of multi-objective optimization and decision-making for construction projects
    Zhang, YS
    Wang, YW
    Zhai, FY
    Li, LB
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2001, : 2105 - 2109
  • [23] Fuzzy multi-objective optimization decision-making of reliability of series system
    Huang, HZ
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1997, 37 (03): : 447 - 449
  • [24] Multi-objective Robust Optimization and Decision-Making Using Evolutionary Algorithms
    Yadav, Deepanshu
    Ramu, Palaniappan
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, GECCO 2023, 2023, : 786 - 794
  • [25] Research on a Multi-objective Fuzzy Optimization Model of Group Decision-making
    Zhu, Jiajun
    Qin, Chaoyon
    Zheng, Jianguo
    ADVANCES IN BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 : 748 - 753
  • [26] Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization for Decision-Making in Building Automation
    Yang, Rui
    Wang, Lingfeng
    Wang, Zhu
    2011 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2011,
  • [27] Multi-objective decision-making for road design
    Brauers, Willem Karel M.
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Peldschus, Friedel
    Turskis, Zenonas
    TRANSPORT, 2008, 23 (03) : 183 - 193
  • [28] A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Making
    Roijers, Diederik M.
    Vamplew, Peter
    Whiteson, Shimon
    Dazeley, Richard
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2013, 48 : 67 - 113
  • [29] A multi-objective synergistic optimization model considering the water-energy-food-carbon nexus and bioenergy
    Yang, Gaiqiang
    Su, Yuxin
    Huo, Lijuan
    Guo, Dongpeng
    Wu, Yusi
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2025, 312
  • [30] Multi-objective decision-making method of IS outsourcing
    Wang Zuzhu
    Zhou Xiaoxi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING - MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES SECTION, 2007, : 1170 - 1175