Systematic Review of Quantitative Risk Quantification Methods in Construction Accidents

被引:1
|
作者
Kumi, Louis [1 ]
Jeong, Jaewook [1 ]
Jeong, Jaemin [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Safety Engn, 232 Gongneung Ro, Seoul 01811, South Korea
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil & Mineral Engn, 27 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
construction safety; accident risk analysis; quantitative methods; risk assessment; systematic review; artificial intelligence; SAFETY; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; INDUSTRY; CLASSIFICATION; INCIDENTS; BEHAVIOR; EVENTS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/buildings14103306
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Construction accidents pose significant risks to workers and the public, affecting industry productivity and reputation. While several reviews have discussed risk assessment methods, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, and real-time decision support systems have created a need for an updated synthesis of the quantitative methodologies applied in construction safety. This study systematically reviews the literature from the past decade, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A thorough search identified studies utilizing statistical analysis, mathematical modeling, simulation, and artificial intelligence (AI). These methods were categorized and analyzed based on their effectiveness and limitations. Statistical approaches, such as correlation analysis, examined relationships between variables, while mathematical models, like factor analysis, quantified risk factors. Simulation methods, such as Monte Carlo simulations, explored risk dynamics and AI techniques, including machine learning, enhanced predictive modeling, and decision making in construction safety. This review highlighted the strengths of handling large datasets and improving accuracy, but also noted challenges like data quality and methodological limitations. Future research directions are suggested to address these gaps. This study contributes to construction safety management by offering an overview of best practices and opportunities for advancing quantitative risk assessment methodologies.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative risk assessment of railroad derailment accidents
    Dykes, AA
    Wolf, GP
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 1729 - 1734
  • [32] Research on the Influence of Risk on Construction Project Performance: A Systematic Review
    Su, Guiliang
    Khallaf, Rana
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [33] Intelligent Risk Management in Construction Projects: Systematic Literature Review
    Chenya, Liao
    Aminudin, Eeydzah
    Mohd, Suzila
    Yap, Loh Seng
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 (72936-72954): : 72936 - 72954
  • [34] Supply chain risk management research in construction: a systematic review
    Pham, Hai Thanh
    Pham, Tho
    Truong Quang, Huy
    Dang, Chau Ngoc
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23 (11) : 1945 - 1955
  • [35] AN INTEGRATED QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS METHOD FOR MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS USING FUZZY CONCEPTS AND INFLUENCE DIAGRAM
    Lin, Yong-Huang
    Lin, Chen-Chung
    Tyan, Yaw-Yauan
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TAIWAN, 2011, 19 (04): : 383 - 391
  • [36] Dating Violence among High-Risk Young Women: A Systematic Review Using Quantitative and Qualitative Methods
    Joly, Lauren E.
    Connolly, Jennifer
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2016, 6 (01)
  • [37] Quantification of the demands of cricket bowling and the relationship to injury risk: a systematic review
    Matthew Constable
    Daniel Wundersitz
    Rodrigo Bini
    Michael Kingsley
    BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 13
  • [38] Quantification of the demands of cricket bowling and the relationship to injury risk: a systematic review
    Constable, Matthew
    Wundersitz, Daniel
    Bini, Rodrigo
    Kingsley, Michael
    BMC SPORTS SCIENCE MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [39] Quantitative Health Risk Assessment of Indoor Radon: A Systematic Review
    Ajrouche, R.
    Ielsch, G.
    Clero, E.
    Roudier, C.
    Gay, D.
    Guillevic, J.
    Laurier, D.
    Le Tertre, A.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2017, 177 (1-2) : 69 - 77
  • [40] Arctic shipping risk management: A bibliometric analysis and a systematic review of risk influencing factors of navigational accidents
    Fu, Shanshan
    Goerlandt, Floris
    Xi, Yongtao
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2021, 139