External environmental costs of electricity generation using a life cycle approach: A case study of Spain

被引:0
|
作者
San Miguel, Guillermo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Sch Ind Engn ETSII, Grp Agroenerget, C Jose Gutierrez Abascal 2, Madrid 28006, Spain
关键词
Externalities; Monetary valuation; Electricity; LCA; Renewables; Fossil; ReCiPe;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2024.121849
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Electricity generation produces impacts on the natural and human environment that need to be measured and properly managed. This investigation describes the potential of integrating LCA with monetary valuation to quantify the magnitude of these impacts in economic terms (<euro>). Fourteen power generation technologies (5 fossil, 8 renewable and nuclear, based in Spain) were evaluated using LCA on 18 midpoint and 3 endpoint categories, as listed in ReCiPe2016. The results showed very high external costs in fossil technologies (from 435 to 636 <euro>/MWh for coal-based to 109-154 <euro>/MWh for natural gas) and significantly lower for renewables (5-77 <euro>/MWh) and nuclear (3.3 <euro>/MWh), with higher values corresponding to biomass and lowest to wind power and nuclear. External costs from fossil technologies were dominated by damage to human health caused by climate change, particulate emissions and exhaustion of fossil resources generated during the operation stage. External costs from renewables were dominated by the same categories plus exhaustion of mineral resources, in this case produced during the extraction of raw materials stage. These results demonstrate the profound unsustainability of fossil, whose external costs largely exceed wholesale market prices.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic life cycle assessment of European electricity generation based on a retrospective approach
    Naumann, Gabriel
    Famiglietti, Jacopo
    Schropp, Elke
    Motta, Mario
    Gaderer, Matthias
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 311
  • [32] Evolution of External Health Costs of Electricity Generation in the Baltic States
    Lu, Jintao
    Zhang, Chong
    Ren, Licheng
    Liang, Mengshang
    Strielkowski, Wadim
    Streimikis, Justas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (15) : 1 - 22
  • [33] Water impact analysis due to coal-electricity generation using the life cycle assessment method: a case study in Malaysia
    Mardi, Nurul Hani
    Ean, Lee Woen
    Malek, Marlinda Abdul
    Chua, Kok Hua
    Ahmed, Ali Najah
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 91 (02) : 219 - 234
  • [34] Life-cycle environmental performance assessment of electricity generation and transmission systems in Greece
    Orfanos, Neoptolemos
    Mitzelos, Dimitris
    Sagani, Angeliki
    Dedoussis, Vassilis
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 139 : 1447 - 1462
  • [35] Life cycle assessment, electricity generation and sustainability
    Aumonier, S
    NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 1998, 37 (05): : 295 - 302
  • [36] Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation
    Stoppato, A.
    ENERGY, 2008, 33 (02) : 224 - 232
  • [37] Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mauritius
    Brizmohun, Ravina
    Ramjeawon, Toolseeram
    Azapagic, Adisa
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 106 : 565 - 575
  • [38] Life cycle assessment, electricity generation and sustainability
    Aumonier, S.
    Nuclear Energy, 1998, 37 (05): : 295 - 302
  • [39] Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China
    Di, Xianghua
    Nie, Zuoren
    Yuan, Baorong
    Zuo, Tieyong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (04): : 217 - 224
  • [40] Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China
    Xianghua Di
    Zuroen Nie
    Baorong Yuan
    Tieyong Zuo
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12 : 217 - 224