Process-monitoring-for-quality — A model selection criterion

被引:4
|
作者
Escobar C.A. [1 ,2 ]
Morales-Menendez R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Global Research & Development, General Motors, Warren, MI
关键词
Big data driven manufacturing; Binary classification; Highly unbalanced data structures; Model selection criterion; Process monitoring for quality;
D O I
10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.01.001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The new big data driven manufacturing quality philosophy, Process Monitoring for Quality (PMQ), proposes Big Data — Big Models, a new modeling paradigm that includes a big data-driven learning process that requires many models to be created to find the final one. Since many candidates are created, one of the main challenges is to select the model that efficiently solves the tradeoff between complexity and prediction. Most mature manufacturing organizations generate only a few Defects Per Million of Opportunities (DPMO); therefore, manufacturing-derived data sets for classification of quality tend to be highly unbalanced. The Penalized Maximum Probability of Correct Decision (PMPCD) is developed to solve the posed tradeoff. According to simulation and experimental results, the model selection criterion induces parsimony by selecting the model with the minimum number of features needed for an effective/efficient defect detection. © 2018
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 58
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A critique of the Bayesian information criterion for model selection
    Weakliem, DL
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1999, 27 (03) : 359 - 397
  • [42] The covariance inflation criterion for adaptive model selection
    Tibshirani, R
    Knight, K
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1999, 61 : 529 - 546
  • [43] Model selection criterion applied to visual perception
    Liu, Yunhui
    Zou, Qi
    Luo, SiWei
    Lv, ZiAng
    2006 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-4, 2006, : 2484 - +
  • [44] A comprehensive model for process selection by considering offline and online quality control
    Jerusalem, Mohammad Adam
    Lin, Shi-Woei
    Irianto, Dradjad
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MECHANICAL DESIGN SYSTEMS AND MANUFACTURING, 2016, 10 (04):
  • [45] Correction to: Process monitoring for quality - a feature selection method for highly unbalanced binary data
    Carlos A. Escobar Diaz
    Jorge Arinez
    Daniela Macías Arregoyta
    Ruben Morales-Menendez
    International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 2022, 16 : 573 - 573
  • [46] Components of structural monitoring process and selection of monitoring system
    Glisic, B
    Inaudi, D
    FIELD MEASUREMENTS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2003, : 755 - 761
  • [47] Model selection and change detection for a time-varying mean in process monitoring
    Burr, Tom
    Hamada, Michael S.
    Ticknor, Larry
    Weaver, Brian
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2014, 751 : 79 - 87
  • [48] A semiparametric model selection criterion with applications to the marginal structural model
    Brookhart, MA
    van der Laan, MJ
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2006, 50 (02) : 475 - 498
  • [49] Explaining the impact of design choices on model quality in predictive process monitoring
    Kim, Sungkyu
    Comuzzi, Marco
    Di Francescomarino, Chiara
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024,
  • [50] Monitoring wafers' geometric quality using an additive Gaussian process model
    Zhang, Linmiao
    Wang, Kaibo
    Chen, Nan
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 48 (01) : 1 - 15