Process-monitoring-for-quality — A model selection criterion

被引:4
|
作者
Escobar C.A. [1 ,2 ]
Morales-Menendez R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Global Research & Development, General Motors, Warren, MI
关键词
Big data driven manufacturing; Binary classification; Highly unbalanced data structures; Model selection criterion; Process monitoring for quality;
D O I
10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.01.001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The new big data driven manufacturing quality philosophy, Process Monitoring for Quality (PMQ), proposes Big Data — Big Models, a new modeling paradigm that includes a big data-driven learning process that requires many models to be created to find the final one. Since many candidates are created, one of the main challenges is to select the model that efficiently solves the tradeoff between complexity and prediction. Most mature manufacturing organizations generate only a few Defects Per Million of Opportunities (DPMO); therefore, manufacturing-derived data sets for classification of quality tend to be highly unbalanced. The Penalized Maximum Probability of Correct Decision (PMPCD) is developed to solve the posed tradeoff. According to simulation and experimental results, the model selection criterion induces parsimony by selecting the model with the minimum number of features needed for an effective/efficient defect detection. © 2018
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 58
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Process-Monitoring-for-Quality - A Model Selection Criterion for Support Vector Machine
    Escobar, Carlos A.
    Morales-Menendez, Ruben
    47TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (NAMRC 47), 2019, 34 : 1010 - 1017
  • [2] Process-Monitoring-for-Quality - A Model Selection Criterion for l1-Regularized Logistic Regression
    Escobar, Carlos A.
    Morales-Menendez, Ruben
    47TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (NAMRC 47), 2019, 34 : 832 - 839
  • [3] Process-Monitoring-for-Quality - Big Models
    Escobar, Carlos A.
    Abell, Jeffrey A.
    Hernandez-de-Menendez, Marcela
    Morales-Menendez, Ruben
    46TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE, NAMRC 46, 2018, 26 : 1167 - 1179
  • [4] Process-monitoring-for-quality-A robust model selection criterion for the logistic regression algorithm
    Escobar, Carlos A.
    Morales-Menendez, Ruben
    MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2019, 22 : 6 - 10
  • [5] Using a classifier ensemble for proactive quality monitoring and control: The impact of the choice of classifiers types, selection criterion, and fusion process
    Thomas, Philippe
    El Haouzi, Hind Bril
    Suhner, Marie-Christine
    Thomas, Andre
    Zimmermann, Emmanuel
    Noyel, Melanie
    COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2018, 99 : 193 - 204
  • [6] Process model quality monitoring of model predictive controller
    Liu, Lei
    Ling, Dan
    Wu, Yaqiong
    Zheng, Ying
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC 2017), 2017, : 4391 - 4396
  • [7] Improved model selection criterion
    Rahman, MS
    King, ML
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 1999, 28 (01) : 51 - 71
  • [8] A Criterion for Local Model Selection
    G. Avlogiaris
    A. C. Micheas
    K. Zografos
    Sankhya A, 2019, 81 : 406 - 444
  • [9] A New Criterion for Model Selection
    Hoang Pham
    MATHEMATICS, 2019, 7 (12)
  • [10] A Criterion for Local Model Selection
    Avlogiaris, G.
    Zografos, K.
    Micheas, A. C.
    SANKHYA-SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY, 2019, 81 (02): : 406 - 444