Ecosystem service supply–demand and socioecological drivers at different spatial scales in Zhejiang Province, China

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Liang-Jie [1 ,2 ]
Gong, Jian-Wen [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Shuang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiaomian [3 ]
Jiang, Jiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Co-Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing,210037, China
[2] Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Soil Erosion and Ecological Restoration, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing,210037, China
[3] Zhejiang Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou,310023, China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Commerce - Decision trees - Economic and social effects - Food storage - Forestry - Pixels - Population statistics - Soil conservation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the scale effects of ecosystem service (ES) supply–demand balances and drivers is critical to hierarchical ecosystem management. However, it remains unclear how the relationships of ES supply–demand and driving factors change with the scale. In this study, we first quantified food production (FP), water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon storage (CS), and habitat quality (HQ) at pixel and county scales in 2000 and 2020 in Zhejiang Province. Then, we analyzed the ES supply–demand balances and trade-offs/synergies at different scales. Finally, we performed correlation analysis and applied a random forest model to explore the socioecological drivers of these ESs. Our work showed that the supplies of FP, WY, and SC increased, while those of CS and HQ decreased from 2000 to 2020. ESs at the pixel scale were more spatially heterogeneous than those at the county scale. FP and CS were in short supply, and the gaps between their supply and demand grew over time. Some ES supply–demand mismatches at the pixel scale disappeared at the county scale. From the pixel scale to the county scale, the correlation directions of the ES trade-offs/synergies changed slightly, but their intensities changed significantly. The temperature, altitude, percentage of forestland and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) had positive effects on HQ, CS and SC, while the population density (POP), gross domestic product and percentage of artificial land (PA) had negative effects. The degree of influence of most socioecological drivers on the ESs increased with increasing scale. NDVI was the most important factor for CS, while precipitation was the most important for WY. The importance of POP and PA increased with both time and scale. Ultimately, overall ES supply–demand balances should be considered at the county scale, while more accurate management measures should be implemented at the pixel scale to promote effective hierarchical ES management. This study emphasizes the necessity of considering the scale effects for ES supply–demand balances in sustainable ecosystem management. © 2022 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The shift in the spatiotemporal relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services and its drivers in China
    Su, Rui
    Duan, Cuncun
    Chen, Bin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 365
  • [22] Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Multi-scale Spatial Balance and Matching Analysis of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand in Hubei Province
    Yu, Hao-Xuan
    Tang, Jiang-Long
    Chen, Rong-Qing
    [J]. Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (11): : 6477 - 6488
  • [23] Understanding supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services and interactive effects of drivers to support spatial planning in Tianjin metropolis, China
    Li, Jiaying
    Geneletti, Davide
    Wang, Hongcheng
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 895
  • [24] Key questions for understanding drivers of biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships across spatial scales
    Mitchell, Matthew G. E.
    Qiu, Jiangxiao
    Cardinale, Bradley J.
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Eigenbrod, Felix
    Felipe-Lucia, Maria R.
    Jacob, Aerin L.
    Jones, Matthew S.
    Sonter, Laura J.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2024, 39 (02)
  • [25] Key questions for understanding drivers of biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships across spatial scales
    Matthew G. E. Mitchell
    Jiangxiao Qiu
    Bradley J. Cardinale
    Kai M. A. Chan
    Felix Eigenbrod
    María R. Felipe-Lucia
    Aerin L. Jacob
    Matthew S. Jones
    Laura J. Sonter
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 39
  • [26] Scale effects on the supply-demand mismatches of ecosystem services in Hubei Province, China
    He, Guoyu
    Zhang, Lei
    Wei, Xiaojian
    Jin, Gui
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 153
  • [27] Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services supply-demand and economic development in China
    Liu, Chunjiang
    Niu, Jia
    [J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 2015, 8 (02): : 832 - 837
  • [28] Matching and coupling coordination between the supply and demand for ecosystem services in Hunan Province, China
    Yu, Juan
    Yi, Liwen
    Xie, Binggeng
    Li, Xiaoqing
    Li, Junhan
    Xiao, Jianyong
    Zhang, Li
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 157
  • [29] Linking Ecosystem Service Supply-Demand Risks and Regional Spatial Management in the Yihe River Basin, Central China
    Meng, Qingxiang
    Zhang, Likun
    Wei, Hejie
    Cai, Enxiang
    Xue, Dong
    Liu, Mengxue
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (08)
  • [30] Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Kroll, Franziska
    Nedkov, Stoyan
    Mueller, Felix
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 17 - 29