Ecosystem service supply–demand and socioecological drivers at different spatial scales in Zhejiang Province, China

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Liang-Jie [1 ,2 ]
Gong, Jian-Wen [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Shuang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiaomian [3 ]
Jiang, Jiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Co-Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing,210037, China
[2] Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Soil Erosion and Ecological Restoration, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing,210037, China
[3] Zhejiang Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou,310023, China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Commerce - Decision trees - Economic and social effects - Food storage - Forestry - Pixels - Population statistics - Soil conservation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the scale effects of ecosystem service (ES) supply–demand balances and drivers is critical to hierarchical ecosystem management. However, it remains unclear how the relationships of ES supply–demand and driving factors change with the scale. In this study, we first quantified food production (FP), water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon storage (CS), and habitat quality (HQ) at pixel and county scales in 2000 and 2020 in Zhejiang Province. Then, we analyzed the ES supply–demand balances and trade-offs/synergies at different scales. Finally, we performed correlation analysis and applied a random forest model to explore the socioecological drivers of these ESs. Our work showed that the supplies of FP, WY, and SC increased, while those of CS and HQ decreased from 2000 to 2020. ESs at the pixel scale were more spatially heterogeneous than those at the county scale. FP and CS were in short supply, and the gaps between their supply and demand grew over time. Some ES supply–demand mismatches at the pixel scale disappeared at the county scale. From the pixel scale to the county scale, the correlation directions of the ES trade-offs/synergies changed slightly, but their intensities changed significantly. The temperature, altitude, percentage of forestland and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) had positive effects on HQ, CS and SC, while the population density (POP), gross domestic product and percentage of artificial land (PA) had negative effects. The degree of influence of most socioecological drivers on the ESs increased with increasing scale. NDVI was the most important factor for CS, while precipitation was the most important for WY. The importance of POP and PA increased with both time and scale. Ultimately, overall ES supply–demand balances should be considered at the county scale, while more accurate management measures should be implemented at the pixel scale to promote effective hierarchical ES management. This study emphasizes the necessity of considering the scale effects for ES supply–demand balances in sustainable ecosystem management. © 2022 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecosystem service supply-demand and socioecological drivers at different spatial scales in Zhejiang Province, China
    Wang, Liang-Jie
    Gong, Jian-Wen
    Ma, Shuai
    Wu, Shuang
    Zhang, Xiaomian
    Jiang, Jiang
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 140
  • [2] Evolution and coupled matching of ecosystem service supply and demand at different spatial scales in the Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration, China
    Yan, Shuwan
    Chen, Hao
    Quan, Quan
    Liu, Jian
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 155
  • [3] Study on the Ecosystem Service Supply-Demand Relationship and Development Strategies in Mountains in Southwest China Based on Different Spatial Scales
    Wang, Yahui
    Dai, Erfu
    Qi, Yue
    Fan, Yao
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (11)
  • [4] Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales
    Larondelle, Neele
    Lauf, Steffen
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 : 18 - 31
  • [5] Analysis of ecosystem service drivers based on interpretive machine learning: a case study of Zhejiang Province, China
    Xu, Xiaohang
    Yu, Jie
    Wang, Feier
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (42) : 64060 - 64076
  • [6] Analysis of ecosystem service drivers based on interpretive machine learning: a case study of Zhejiang Province, China
    Xiaohang Xu
    Jie Yu
    Feier Wang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 64060 - 64076
  • [7] Spatial drivers of ecosystem services supply-demand balances in the Nanjing metropolitan area, China
    Lv, Ligang
    Han, Xu
    Zhu, Junjun
    Liao, Kaihua
    Yang, Qingke
    Wang, Xiaorui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [8] Identifying Critical Area of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand at Different Scales Based on Spatial Heterogeneity Assessment and SOFM Neural Network
    Liao, Guitang
    He, Peng
    Gao, Xuesong
    Lin, Zhengyu
    Fang, Conggang
    Zhou, Wei
    Xu, Chenghua
    Deng, Liangji
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [9] Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions and their drivers at different spatial scales in the Yellow River Basin
    Liu, Qi
    Qiao, Jiajun
    Li, Mengjuan
    Huang, Mengjiao
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 908
  • [10] Identifying the spatial relationships and drivers of ecosystem service supply-demand - demand matching: A case of Yiluo River Basin
    Chen, Yuru
    Qiao, Xuning
    Yang, Yongju
    Zheng, Jinchan
    Dai, Yulong
    Zhang, Jing
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 163