Uncertainty representation and evaluation for modelling and decision-making in information fusion

被引:0
|
作者
De Villiers, J.P. [1 ,2 ]
Pavlin, G. [3 ]
Jousselme, A.-L. [4 ]
Maskell, S. [5 ]
Waal, A.D.E. [1 ,6 ]
Laskey, K. [7 ]
Blasch, E. [8 ]
Costa, P. [7 ]
机构
[1] University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa
[3] D-CIS Lab, Thales Research and Technology, Delft, Netherlands
[4] NATO STO Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation, La Spezia, Italy
[5] University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
[6] Center for Artificial Intelligence Research (CAIR), Cape Town, South Africa
[7] George Mason University, Fairfax,VA, United States
[8] Air Force Research Lab, Arlington,VA, United States
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, the uncertainties that enter through the life-cycle of an information fusion system are exhaustively and explicitly considered and defined. Addressing the factors that influence a fusion system is an essential step required before uncertainty representation and reasoning processes within a fusion system can be evaluated according to the Uncertainty Representation and Reasoning Evaluation Framework (URREF) ontology. The life cycle of a fusion system consists primarily of two stages, namely inception and design, as well as routine operation and assessment. During the inception and design stage, the primary flow is that of abstraction, through modelling and representation of real-world phenomena. This stage is mainly characterised by epistemic uncertainty. During the routine operation and assessment stage, aleatory uncertainty combines with epistemic uncertainty from the design phase as well as uncertainty about the effect of actions on the mission in a feedback loop (another form of epistemic uncertainty). Explicit and accurate internal modelling of these uncertainties, and the evaluation of how these uncertainties are represented and reasoned about in the fusion system using the URREF ontology, are the main contributions of this paper for the information fusion community. This paper is an extension of previous works by the authors, where all uncertainties pertaining to the complete fusion life cycle are now jointly and comprehensively considered. Also, uncertainties pertaining to the decision process are further detailed. © 2018 JAIF.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 215
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING
    LAUER, H
    BETRIEBSWIRT, 1977, 18 (03): : 65 - 69
  • [32] INFORMATION FOR DECISION-MAKING
    MORRIS, A
    ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 1984, 36 (11-1): : 411 - 414
  • [33] Distance entropy based decision-making information fusion method
    Guan, Qing-Yun
    Chen, Xue-Long
    Wang, Yan-Zhang
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2015, 35 (01): : 216 - 227
  • [34] ASSESSING DECISION-MAKING RISK AND INFORMATION NEEDS IN EVALUATION
    BROWN, RD
    PRENTICE, DG
    EVALUATION REVIEW, 1987, 11 (03) : 371 - 381
  • [35] Evaluation of soil test information in agricultural decision-making
    Babcock, BA
    Carriquiry, AL
    Stern, HS
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 1996, 45 (04) : 447 - 461
  • [36] Evaluation of Information Sources in Plastic Surgery Decision-making
    Parmeshwar, Nisha
    Reid, Chris M.
    Park, Andrew J.
    Brandel, Michael G.
    Dobke, Marek K.
    Gosman, Amanda A.
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (06):
  • [37] DECISION-MAKING IN FUZZY ENVIRONMENT FUZZY INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING
    TANAKA, H
    OKUDA, T
    ASAI, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1977, 15 (06) : 623 - 635
  • [38] ECONOMIC DECISION-MAKING MODELLING
    Terebukh, A. A.
    ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 2012, (136): : 275 - 282
  • [39] Modelling curiosity in decision-making
    Baharlou, Kusha
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2017, 82 (01) : 75 - 91
  • [40] Modelling complex decision-making
    Smith, SA
    SYNERGY MATTERS: WORKING WITH SYSTEMS IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 1999, : 145 - 150