Impact of the protein data bank across scientific disciplines

被引:0
|
作者
Feng Z. [1 ,2 ]
Verdiguel N. [3 ]
Di Costanzo L. [1 ,4 ]
Goodsell D.S. [1 ,5 ]
Westbrook J.D. [1 ,2 ]
Burley S.K. [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Zardecki C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
[2] Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
[3] University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
[4] Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici
[5] Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA
[6] Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
[7] Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
[8] Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Citation patterns; Interdisciplinary; Open access; Open science; Structural biology;
D O I
10.5334/DSJ-2020-025
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Protein Data Bank archive (PDB) was established in 1971 as the 1st open access digital data resource for biology and medicine. Today, the PDB contains >160,000 atomic-level, experimentally-determined 3D biomolecular structures. PDB data are freely and publicly available for download, without restrictions. Each entry contains summary information about the structure and experiment, atomic coordinates, and in most cases, a citation to a corresponding scientific publication. Individually and in bulk, PDB structures can be downloaded and/or analyzed and visualized online using tools at RCSB.org. As such, it is challenging to understand and monitor reuse of data. Citations of the scientific publications describing PDB structures provide one way of understanding which structures are being used, and in which research areas. Our analysis highlights frequently-cited structures and identifies milestone structures that have demonstrated impact across scientific fields. © 2020 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Analysis of impact metrics for the Protein Data Bank
    Markosian, Christopher
    Di Costanzo, Luigi
    Sekharan, Monica
    Shao, Chenghua
    Burley, Stephen K.
    Zardecki, Christine
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2018, 5
  • [12] Analysis of impact metrics for the Protein Data Bank
    Christopher Markosian
    Luigi Di Costanzo
    Monica Sekharan
    Chenghua Shao
    Stephen K. Burley
    Christine Zardecki
    Scientific Data, 5
  • [13] Uses for Twitter across disciplines and throughout the scientific process
    Federer, Lisa M.
    IDEAS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2013, 6 (01): : 44 - 45
  • [14] Comparative Causation at Multiple Levels and Across Scientific Disciplines
    Weber, Erik
    De Vreese, Leen
    AXIOMATHES, 2017, 27 (06): : 667 - 683
  • [15] Journey across the disciplines: A foundation for scientific communication in bioastronomy
    Offerdahl, EG
    Morrow, CA
    Prather, EE
    Slater, TF
    ASTROBIOLOGY, 2005, 5 (05) : 651 - 657
  • [16] Comparative Causation at Multiple Levels and Across Scientific Disciplines
    Erik Weber
    Leen De Vreese
    Axiomathes, 2017, 27 : 667 - 683
  • [17] Distributions of scientific funding across universities and research disciplines
    Wu, Jiang
    JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2015, 9 (01) : 183 - 196
  • [18] THE DECLINE OF SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION WITHIN AND ACROSS ACADEMIC DISCIPLINES
    HOLLINGSWORTH, JR
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 1986, 14 (03) : 422 - 428
  • [19] Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Klavans, Richard
    Boyack, Kevin W.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2016, 14 (07)
  • [20] Grassland with tradition: sampling across several scientific disciplines
    Janisova, Monika
    Iuga, Anamaria
    Ivascu, Cosmin Marius
    Magnes, Martin
    VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION AND SURVEY, 2021, 2 : 19 - 35