Models that learn how humans learn: The case of decision-making and its disorders

被引:0
|
作者
Dezfouli, Amir [1 ,2 ]
Griffiths, Kristi [3 ]
Ramos, Fabio [4 ]
Dayan, Peter [5 ,6 ]
Balleine, Bernard W. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Psychology, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
[2] Data61, CSIRO, Australia
[3] Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
[4] University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
[5] Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, UCL, London, United Kingdom
[6] Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
来源
PLoS Computational Biology | 2019年 / 15卷 / 06期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Recurrent neural networks - Reinforcement learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Popular computational models of decision-making make specific assumptions about learning processes that may cause them to underfit observed behaviours. Here we suggest an alternative method using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to generate a flexible family of models that have sufficient capacity to represent the complex learning and decision- making strategies used by humans. In this approach, an RNN is trained to predict the next action that a subject will take in a decision-making task and, in this way, learns to imitate the processes underlying subjects' choices and their learning abilities. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach using a new dataset drawn from patients with either unipolar (n = 34) or bipolar (n = 33) depression and matched healthy controls (n = 34) making decisions on a two-armed bandit task. The results indicate that this new approach is better than baseline reinforcement-learning methods in terms of overall performance and its capacity to predict subjects' choices. We show that the model can be interpreted using off-policy simulations and thereby provides a novel clustering of subjects' learning processes-something that often eludes traditional approaches to modelling and behavioural analysis. © 2019 Dezfouli et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How to use fitness landscape models for the analysis of collective decision-making: a case of theory-transfer and its limitations
    Peter Marks
    Lasse Gerrits
    Johannes Marx
    Biology & Philosophy, 2019, 34
  • [32] Gender Differences in Self-Advocacy Among Cancer Survivors: How Women and Men Vary in How They Learn to Engage in Decision-Making and Social Support
    Lazris, David
    Donovan, Heidi S.
    Scott, Paul
    Nilsen, Marci L.
    Thomas, Teresa Hagan
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [33] How to select predictive models for decision-making or causal inference
    Doutreligne, Matthieu
    Varoquaux, Gael
    GIGASCIENCE, 2025, 14
  • [34] SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT AND DECISION-MAKING IN HUMANS
    SULLIVAN, MS
    BURNHAM, D
    STEVENSWOOD, B
    SHELDON, BC
    BEHAVIOUR, 1995, 132 : 571 - 589
  • [35] Multisensory Decision-Making in Rats and Humans
    Raposo, David
    Sheppard, John P.
    Schrater, Paul R.
    Churchland, Anne K.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 32 (11): : 3726 - 3735
  • [37] How did Neanderthals and other ancient humans learn to count?
    Colin Barras
    Nature, 2021, 594 : 22 - 25
  • [38] Education System to Learn the Skills of Management Decision-Making by Using Business Simulator with Speech Recognition Technology
    Sakata, Daiki
    Akiyama, Yusuke
    Kaneko, Masaaki
    Kumagai, Satoshi
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2014, 13 (03): : 267 - 277
  • [39] Challenge clusters facing LCA in environmental decision-making—what we can learn from biofuels
    Marcelle C. McManus
    Caroline M. Taylor
    Alison Mohr
    Carly Whittaker
    Corinne D. Scown
    Aiduan Li Borrion
    Neryssa J. Glithero
    Yao Yin
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 1399 - 1414
  • [40] Humans Optimize Decision-Making by Delaying Decision Onset
    Teichert, Tobias
    Ferrera, Vincent P.
    Grinband, Jack
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):