Comparative analysis of machine learning prediction models of container ships propulsion power

被引:0
|
作者
dos Santos Ferreira, Ricardo [1 ]
Padilha de Lima, João Victor [1 ]
Caprace, Jean-David [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Ocean Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Brazil
关键词
Air pollutants - Comparative analyzes - Container ships - Greenhouses gas - Marine transport - Prediction modelling - Predictive algorithms - Predictive models - Propulsion power - Ship emissions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Regulations on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) ship's emissions and air pollutant are becoming more restrictive. Therefore, a big effort is being put into ship efficiency discussion, specially on predictive models related to route optimization, fuel consumption and air emissions. This paper compares machine learning predictive algorithms, based on the following techniques: least-squares, decision trees and neural networks, to estimate ship propulsion power between two 8400 TEU container ships from the same series. Additionally, the influence of having a predictive algorithm trained with data of its sister ships is invesitgated. The data used in this study were recorded from 2009 to 2014 reaching almost 290,000 entries. The results indicate that random forest regression model and decision trees ensemble models have the best fit for this purpose. It has also confirmed the feasibility of predicting the delivered power of a ship having a machine learning algorithm feed with a sister ship information despite differences in the route and/or operating conditions. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning and Machine Learning Techniques for Power System Fault type Classification and Location Prediction
    Bodda, Sivaramarao
    Thawait, Anjali
    Agnihotri, Prashant
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL IOT, ELECTRONICS AND MECHATRONICS CONFERENCE (IEMTRONICS), 2022, : 796 - 804
  • [42] Wind power output prediction: a comparative study of extreme learning machine
    Wang, Zheng-Chuang
    Niu, Jin-Cai
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 11
  • [43] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Day-Ahead Photovoltaic Power Production Forecasting
    Theocharides, Spyros
    Theristis, Marios
    Makrides, George
    Kynigos, Marios
    Spanias, Chrysovalantis
    Georghiou, George E.
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [44] Hierarchical Bayesian propulsion power models-A simplified example with cruise ships
    Solonen, Antti
    Maraia, Ramona
    Springer, Sebastian
    Haario, Heikki
    Laine, Marko
    Raty, Olle
    Jalkanen, Jukka-Pekka
    Antola, Matti
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 285
  • [45] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONAL PROPERTIES OF PROPULSION SYSTEMS OF ROPAX TYPE SHIPS
    Adamkiewicz, Andrzej
    Jarzecki, Lukasz
    EKSPLOATACJA I NIEZAWODNOSC-MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY, 2009, (02): : 52 - 62
  • [46] Comparative analysis of operational properties of propulsion systems of ropax type ships
    Adamkiewicz, Andrzej
    Jarzecki, Lukasz
    Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc, 2009, 42 (02) : 52 - 62
  • [47] Machine Learning Based Comparative Analysis for Breast Cancer Prediction
    Monirujjaman Khan, Mohammad
    Islam, Somayea
    Sarkar, Srobani
    Ayaz, Foyazel Iben
    Ananda, Morsaleen Kabeer
    Tazin, Tahia
    Albraikan, Amani Abdulrahman
    Almalki, Faris A.
    Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, 2022
  • [48] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Prediction of Heart Diseases
    I. V. Stepanyan
    Ch. A. Alimbayev
    M. O. Savkin
    D. Lyu
    M. Zidun
    Journal of Machinery Manufacture and Reliability, 2022, 51 : 789 - 799
  • [49] CHURN PREDICTION - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
    Gangadharan, Chika K.
    Alex, Roshni
    Sabu, M. K.
    ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 20 (12): : 3049 - 3060
  • [50] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Prediction of Heart Diseases
    Stepanyan, I. V.
    Alimbayev, Ch. A.
    Savkin, M. O.
    Lyu, D.
    Zidun, M.
    JOURNAL OF MACHINERY MANUFACTURE AND RELIABILITY, 2022, 51 (08) : 789 - 799