Systemic approach to revamp unsignalized intersections using multi-criteria decision making: a comparison of alternative solutions

被引:0
|
作者
Ganguly S. [1 ]
Dutta M. [2 ]
Ghosh T. [3 ]
Ahmed M.A. [4 ]
Maitra B. [5 ]
机构
[1] RCG School of Infrastructure Design and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal, Kharagpur
[2] Department of Civil Engineering. Institute of Technology, Nirma University, Gujarat, Ahmedabad
[3] School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gardens Point Campus, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, QLD
[4] Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Assam, Silchar
[5] Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal, Kharagpur
来源
关键词
emission; EnViVer; mini roundabout; safety; SSAM; VISSIM;
D O I
10.53136/97912218000673
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Unsignalized intersections in urban areas require revamping when traffic volume becomes high or movement is unsafe. In developing countries, due to heavy land use and unplanned growth of cities, road extension is not feasible. So, the performance of unsignalized intersections has to be improved by utilizing the available road space optimally. This study proposes a methodology to revamp isolated unsignalized intersections in congested urban areas by comparing the performance of four space efficient alternative solutions - Mini Roundabout, Speed Hump, Right Turn Short Lane, and Median U-Turn. The best solution was decided based on multi­criteria decision making to make a holistic improvement in intersection performance. Four performance criteria were considered - flow, average delay, safety, and vehicular emission. VISSIM is used to simulate two isolated unsignalized intersections, and then the network characteristics of the proposed alternative solutions are configured to test their performances based on the four chosen criteria. Multi-criteria decision making approach has shown that mini roundabout is the most suitable design to improve the performance of isolated unsignalized intersections. © 2022, Aracne Editrice. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 48
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Collaborative Process Flexibility Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Patiniotakis, Ioannis
    Papageorgiou, Nikos
    Apostolou, Dimitris
    Verginadis, Yiannis
    Mentzas, Gregoris
    COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS FOR REINDUSTRIALIZATION, 2013, 408 : 691 - 698
  • [42] COMPARISON OF THE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR MACHINE SELECTION PROBLEM
    Eraslan, Erguen
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 642 - 647
  • [43] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [44] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [45] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [46] Comparison of Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods for Selection of Handmade Carpets
    Gupta, Shravan Kumar
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS, 2022, 19 (02) : 658 - 668
  • [47] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for longitudinal data
    Chejarla, Kalyana C.
    Vaidya, Omkarprasad S.
    OPSEARCH, 2024, 61 (03) : 1013 - 1060
  • [48] A linguistic multi-criteria decision making approach based on logical reasoning
    Chen, Shuwei
    Liu, Jun
    Wang, Hui
    Xu, Yang
    Augusto, Juan Carlos
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 258 : 266 - 276
  • [49] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Cansu Dağsuyu
    Ulviye Polat
    Ali Kokangül
    Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 7169 - 7180
  • [50] Multi-criteria linguistic interval group decision-making approach
    Wang Jianqiang & Chen Xiaohong School of Business
    Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2008, (05) : 934 - 938